Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of instrumental parameters for flow injection analysis-thermospray tandem mass spectrometry

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

Optimization of signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) by optimizing electron multiplier (EM) voltage and resolution of the first and second mass analyser in a thermospray (TSP), tandem mass spectrometer system is studied. Using flow injection analysis (FIA) of samples containing eight chlorophenoxy carboxylic acid herbicides and bentazone, and a FIA system, the signal and background (noise) intensity i.e. S/N are studied with selected reaction monitoring (SRM) at different EM voltages. An EM voltage of 2500 V improves the S/N ratios 5.5–13 fold compared to the usual 1700 V. Applying additional resolution voltages of +3 to +4 V to the first and second mass analyser decreases resolution in each mass analyser, but there is no overall loss in selectivity, while the S/N ratios further increase 3–4 fold. The selectivity of measurements was studied using 2,4,5-T ((2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid) and triclopyr, which differ only one mass unit in the selection of the parent and daughter ion mass in the applied SRM method. Resolution could be decreased to 36–54% valley definition, while still ensuring the selectivity. With the herbicides studied, screening of surface water samples spiked at the 1 μg l−1 level, corresponding to 25 pg component s−1 into the MS, is easily achieved under optimum conditions without analyte concentration. Some sample clean-up is recommended, however, because ionization efficiencies tend to diminish with some of the raw sample studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

COFF:

Collision offset voltage

CPCA:

Chlorophenoxy carboxylic acid herbicides

dalton:

Atomic mass unit (12C=12 daltons), symbol “u”

EM:

Electron multiplier

FIA:

Flow injection analysis

LC:

Liquid chromatography

LC-MS:

Liquid chromatography — mass spectrometry

m:

Mass

M/ΔM:

Resolution defined as valley definition

MRM:

Multi reaction monitoring

MS-MS:

Technique utilizing mass analysers in tandem.

MS:

Mass spectromet(er)ry

MSMSC:

Empirical correction factor compensating for loss of energy by ions in collision cell

m/z:

Mass number-to-charge number ratio

NEU:

Neutral loss scan

Q1:

First quadrupole analyser of triple quadrupole MS

Q3:

Second quadrupole analyser of triple quadrupole MS

Q1MS:

MS with tandem mass spectrometer; first mass analyser scanning.

Q3MS:

MS with tandem mass spectrometer; second mass analyser scanning

RIC:

Reconstructed ion chromatogram

S/N:

Signal-to-noise ratio

SRM:

Selected reaction monitoring

Tandem:

MS-MS

TSP:

Thermospray

z:

Charge

References

  1. F. W. McLafferty, Ed., Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Wiley, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. L. Busch, G. L. Glish, S. A. McLuckey, Eds., in Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry, Techniques and Applications of Tandem Mass Spectrometry, VCH Publishers, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Longevialle, Ed., Advances in Mass Spectrometry, Wiley, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Levsen, Org. Mass Spectrom.23, 406 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. P. Bruins, Methodol. Surveys Biochem. Anal.,18, 339 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. B. Geerdink, P. G. M. Kienhuis, U. A. Th. Brinkman, J. Chromatogr.647, 329 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. M. Draper, F. R. Brown, R. Bethem, M. J., Miille, ACS Symp. Ser., Liq. Chromatogr./Mass Spectrom.420, 253 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. D. Voyksner, W. H. McFadden, S. A. Lammert, in Applications of New Mass Spectrometry Techniques in Pesticide Chemistry, J. D. Rosen, Ed., Ch. 17, Wiley, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Pleasance, J. F. Anacleto, M. R. Bailey, D. H. North, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.3, 378 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. G. Beattie, T. J. A. Blake, J. Chromatogr.474, 123 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. D. Betowski, S. M. Pyle, J. M. Ballard, G. M. Shaul, Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom.18, 343 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. S. Chiu, A. Van Langenhove, C. Tanaka, Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom.18, 200 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Pleasance, P. Blay, M. A. Quilliam, G. O'Hara, J. Chromatogr.558, 155 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. F. Schröder, Vom Wasser73, 111 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. F. Schröder, Gewässerschutz, Wasser, Abwasser112, 350 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. F. Schröder, J. Chromatogr.554, 251 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. G. M. Kienhuis, J. Chromatogr.647, 39 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. J. Hayward, J. T. Snodgrass, M. L. Thomson, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.7, 85 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Cairns, E. G. Siegmund, J. J. Stamp, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.1, 89 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Abián, G. Durand, D. Barceló, J. Agric. Food Chem.41, 1264 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. H. Dawson, Ed., Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry and its Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Krishnamurthy, D. J. Beck, R. K. Isensee, Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom.18, 287 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Gelpi, J. Abián, F. Artigas, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.11, 232 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geerdink, R.B., Kienhuis, P.G.M. & Brinkman, U.A.T. Optimization of instrumental parameters for flow injection analysis-thermospray tandem mass spectrometry. Chromatographia 39, 311–319 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274519

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02274519

Key Words

Navigation