Elsevier

Genomics

Volume 14, Issue 1, September 1992, Pages 188-190
Genomics

Short Communication
Linkage study of chronic childhood-onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA): Confirmation of close linkage to D5S39 in French Canadian families

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0888-7543(05)80305-2Get rights and content

Chronic childhood-onset spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is, after Duchenne muscular dystrophy, the most common neuromuscular disorder in childhood. Recent linkage analyses have mapped this disease to 5q12–5q14. We show that chronic SMA (Types II and III) is tightly linked to the marker locus D5S39 (Zmax = 5.47 at ϑ = 0.02) in eight French Canadian families. In contrast to previously published results, we do not observe close linkage between chronic SMA and D5S6 (Zmax = 0.34 at ϑ = 0.18) or D5S78 (Zmax = 0.25 at ϑ = 0.21). Last, we present a family that appears to be discordant for this localization but may represent the first example of an incompletely penetrant individual.

References (18)

  • DanielsR.J. et al.

    Linkage analysis of spinal muscular atrophy

    Genomics

    (1992)
  • MelkiJ. et al.

    Mapping of acute (type I) spinal muscular atrophy to chromosome 5q12–q14

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • PearnJ.

    Classification of spinal muscular atrophies

    Lancet

    (1980)
  • AbdelhakS. et al.

    A PstI polymorphism at the D5S39 locus

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (1990)
  • BishopD.T. et al.

    Report of the committee on the genetic constitution of chromosome 5

    Cytogenet. Cell Genet.

    (1990)
  • BrzustowiczL.M. et al.

    Genetic mapping of chronic childhood-onset spinal muscular atrophy to chromosome 5q11.2–13.3

    Nature

    (1990)
  • ConneallyP.M. et al.

    Report of the committee on methods of linkage analysis and reporting

    Cytogenet. Cell Genet.

    (1985)
  • DubowitzD.

    Muscle Disorders in Childhood

  • GilliamT.C. et al.

    Genetic homogeneity between acute and chronic forms of spinal muscular atrophy

    Nature

    (1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

  • When is a deletion not a deletion? When it is converted

    1997, American Journal of Human Genetics
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text