Elsevier

Nuclear Physics A

Volume 385, Issue 3, 13 September 1982, Pages 373-406
Nuclear Physics A

Analyzing power and differential cross section at 9.9, 11.9 and 13.9 MeV for Ca(n, n)Ca

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(82)90093-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The analyzing power and differential cross section for elastic neutron scattering from calcium have been measured at 9.9, 11.9 and 13.9 MeV using the 2H(d, n)3He source reaction and neutron time-of-flight (t.o.f.) techniques to detect the scattered neutrons. Polarized neutron beams were produced via the polarization transfer reaction 2H(d,n)3He at θ = 0°. The data have been corrected for finite geometry and multiple scattering effects. None of the global neutron-nucleus optical model parameter sets usually referred to in the literature reproduces the present cross-section and analyzing power data. Individual as well as energy-averaged fits of the data resulting from new optical model searches are presented. It is shown that the quoted uncertainties of a recent empirical determination of the real part Δ Vc of the Coulomb correction term are probably underestimated. Our imaginary Coulomb correction term Δ Wc agrees quite well with both a very recent empirical determination and theoretical studies. Although the quality of the fits to the data can be improved by adding l-dependent potentials to the general optical potential, no definite conclusions can be drawn from the present data as to whether or not l-dependent potentials are important in neutron-calcium scattering in the energy range investigated. The data have also been analyzed using a Fourier-Bessel series description of the real central optical potential. Comparing the X2 values, the experimental data are better reproduced by the Fourier-Bessel method than by our Woods-Saxon optical model analyses. The Fourier-Bessel potentials obtained show strong deviations from the standard Woods-Saxon shape but are in good agreement with calculations using the nuclear structure approach.

References (47)

  • N. Vinh Mau et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1976)
  • S.A. Wender et al.

    Nucl. Instr.

    (1980)
  • A.J. Frasca et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1966)
    W.J. McDonald et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1964)
    A.C.B. Richardson et al.

    ANL Report #WASH-1053

    (1964)
  • J. Rapaport et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1977)
  • C.E. Floyd, to be...
  • E. Woye, W. Tornow, G. Mack, C.E. Floyd, P.P. guss, K. Murphy, R.C. Byrd, S.A. Wender, R.L. Walter, T.B. Clegg and W....
  • D.W. Glasgow et al.

    Nucl. Sci. Eng.

    (1976)
  • M. Drosg et al.

    LASL Internal report LA-5732-MS

    (1974)
  • J. Rapaport et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1979)
  • A.M. Lane

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1962)
  • F.G. Perey

    Phys. Rev.

    (1963)
  • W.T.H. van Oers

    Phys. Rev.

    (1971)
  • R.P. DeVito et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1981)
  • L.G. Arnold et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1981)
  • F. Osterfeld et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1981)
  • R.S. Mackintosh et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1977)
  • N. Vinh Mau
  • H. Ngô
  • J.P. Jeukenne et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1977)
    J.P. Jeukenne et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1977)
  • F.A. Brieva et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1977)
  • F. Bjorklund et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1957)
  • L. Rosen et al.

    Ann. of Phys.

    (1965)
  • D.O. Nellis et al.

    Defense Nuclear Agency Report #DNA-2716

    (1972)
  • Cited by (0)

    Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

    ∗∗

    Supported in part by Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst.

    ∗∗∗

    Supported in part by the US Department of Energy.

    ∗∗∗∗

    Present address: Institut für Kernphysik der Technischen Universität Wien, A-1010 Wien, Austria.

    View full text