Elsevier

Nuclear Physics A

Volume 104, Issue 1, 13 November 1967, Pages 136-176
Nuclear Physics A

Test of the DWBA in (3He, α) reactions leading to configuration and analogue states

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(67)90761-0Get rights and content

Abstract

The DWBA methods are re-examined to analyse the reactions 50, 52, 54Cr(3He, α) at EHe = 18 MeV. The use of the (3He, α) reaction as a spectroscopic tool is limited by the angular momentum mismatch which causes the nuclear interior to contribute significantly to the reaction. As a consequence, some of the usual approximations become critical. The “measured” elastic scattering parameters do not sufficiently determine the cross sections. In addition, the degenerate sets of parameters for composite particle scattering in both channels cannot be combined arbitrarily. However, the exact matrix element of the distorted wave theory indicates that the α potential should be roughly equal to the sum of the 3He and neutron potentials. This prescription was found to be valid by calculations of mismatch transitions using all the possible combinations of measured parameters in both channels. The effects of nonlocality and finite range are discussed. It is shown that a sharp radial cutoff is not permissible. The effects of spin-orbit coupling on the angular distributions and absolute cross sections are investigated; the J-effects of the data are partially overestimated by the calculations. The absolute normalization factor of the DWBA cross section, derived from the present analysis, agrees with theoretical predictions. The accuracy of the extracted spectroscopic factors is discussed. The bound state wave functions for the analogue state transitions are obtained by solving the coupled Lane equations. This leads to agreement of the derived spectroscopic factors with the sum rule predictions.

References (47)

  • L.R. Dodd et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1966)
  • R. Bock et al.

    Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.

    (1966)
  • A.M. Lane

    Nuclear Physics

    (1962)
  • B. Kozlowsky et al.

    Nuclear Physics

    (1966)
  • Gy. Bencze and A. Sandalescu, to be...
  • R.M. Drisko et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1963)
  • F.G. Perey et al.

    Nuclear Physics

    (1963)
  • M. Krell
  • J.B. French et al.

    Nuclear Physics

    (1961)
  • R.W. Klingensmith et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1964)
  • R. Bock

    Nuclear Physics

    (1967)
  • L. McFadden et al.

    Nuclear Physics

    (1966)
  • L.L. Lee

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1965)
  • L.L. Lee et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1966)
  • M.K. Brussel et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1965)
  • E. Rost

    Phys. Rev.

    (1967)
  • P. David, R. Bock, H. H. Duhm, U. Lynen and R. Stock, Nuclear Physics, to be...
  • A.G. Blair et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1962)
  • C.M. Fou et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1965)
    C.M. Fou et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1966)
    C.R. Bingham et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1966)
  • B.G. Harvey
  • R.H. Bassel

    Phys. Rev.

    (1965)
  • A.G. BlairR.H. Bassel

    Phys. Rev.

    (1966)
    J.C. Hiebert et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1967)
  • N. Austern

    Selected Topics in Nuclear Theory

    (1963)
  • Cited by (148)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    On leave from the Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik der Universität Bonn.

    ††

    Present address: Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley.

    †††

    Research sponsored by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under cotract with the Union Carbide Corporation.

    View full text