Elsevier

Nuclear Physics A

Volume 534, Issues 3–4, 25 November–2 December 1991, Pages 637-679
Nuclear Physics A

The two-body electrodisintegration of 4He studied through the (e, e′p) reaction

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(91)90465-IGet rights and content

Abstract

Coincidence cross sections obtained with the (e, e′p) reaction are presented for the 4He nucleus. From the measurements, performed in non-parallel kinematics at a relative p-3H kinetic energy in the center-of-mass system of 75 MeV, the proton-triton momentum distribution for recoil momenta up to 350 MeV/c has been extracted. The results show a strong dependence on the kinematical configuration. In order to study this in more detail we extended the 4He(e,e′p)3H experiments to other kinematics, both parallel and non-parallel, and compare these data to phenomenological and microscopic calculations. The phenomenological treatment consists of a distorted-wave impulse approximation (DWIA) analysis using an optical potential. Charge-exchange effects in the final state are accounted for through coupled-channels calculations using the Lane formalism. These phenomenological calculations do not agree with the data. The microscopic calculation, which employs a diagrammatic treatment including the charge-exchange process (e, e′n)(n, p), proton rescattering effects and the contributions from meson-exchange currents, accounts fairly well for the empirical observations. The momentum dependence of the data is compared with theoretical calculations obtained with the VMC and ATMS variational methods for the Urbana and RSC nucleon-nucleon potentials. The results for the Urbana V14 NN potential, including corrections to PWIA using the microscopic model, are in good agreement with the data. The (e, e′n)(n, p) two-step contribution turns out to be an important ingredient for obtaining a satisfactory description of the 4He(e, e′p)3H cross sections. Sum-rule results are presented and the data are compared to results of (p, 2p) and other (e, e′p) experiments.

References (97)

  • L.C. Gomes et al.

    Ann. of Phys.

    (1958)
  • M. Bernheim et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1981)
  • E. Jans et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1987)
  • H. Arenhövel

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1982)
  • J.M. Laget

    Phys. Lett.

    (1985)
  • R. Schiavilla et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1986)
  • J.F.J. van den Brand et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1988)
  • M.N. Rosenbluth

    Phys. Rev.

    (1950)
  • G.G. Simon et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1980)
  • T.K. Lim

    Phys. Lett.

    (1973)
  • H. Lesniak et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1976)
  • W.T.H. van Oers et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1982)
  • E.O. Alt et al.

    JINR Report No. E4-6688

    (1972)
  • J.G. Zabolitzky et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1981)
  • J.G. Zabolitzky et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1982)
  • S. Boffi et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1980)
  • S. Boffi et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1980)
  • S. Boffi et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1982)
  • C. Giusti et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1987)
  • C. Giusti et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1988)
  • D.R. Thompson et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1971)
  • F.G. Perey

    Phys. Rev.

    (1963)
  • D.M. Patterson et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1976)
  • J.M. Laget

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1978)
  • J.M. Laget

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1978)
  • P.J. Mulders
  • L. Lapikás et al.

    J. de Phys. Coll.

    (1984)
  • J.S. McCarthy et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1977)
  • J.B.J.M. Lanen et al.

    Nucl. Instr. Meth.

    (1990)
  • E.A.J.M. Offermann
  • G.J. Kramer
  • R. Darves-Blanc et al.

    Nuovo Cim. Lett.

    (1976)
  • J.M. Laget
  • E. Kujawski

    Phys. Rev.

    (1970)
  • I.E. Langaris et al.

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1981)
  • J.F.J. van den Brand, in...
  • R. Frascaria et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1975)
  • C.F. Perdrisat et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1969)
  • R.B. Wiringa et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1984)
  • H. Arenhövel
  • E. van Meijgaard et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1986)
  • Y. Akaishi

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1984)
  • J.M. LagetJ.M. Laget

    Nucl. Phys.

    (1989)
  • J.M. Laget
  • G. van der Steenhoven et al.

    Phys. Lett.

    (1987)
  • J.F.J. van den Brand et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1991)
  • S. Frullani et al.

    Adv. Nucl. Phys.

    (1984)
  • G.F. Chew

    Phys. Rev.

    (1950)
  • Cited by (14)

    • On the kinematics of (e,e′p) reactions

      2002, Physics of Atomic Nuclei
    • Pion absorption on <sup>4</sup>He into the ppd final state

      2000, Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Present address: Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

    View full text