Comparison of radioactive ion-beam intensities produced by means of thick targets bombarded with neutrons, protons and heavy ions

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(94)95397-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Target and ion-source techniques which allow rapid separation of thermalized radioactive nuclei from 1–500 gcm2 thick irradiated target material and continuously convert them into a mono-isotopic ion beam have been proven to be a powerful method of radiochemical separation. These techniques combine nuclear reactions with high-temperature chemistry, metallurgy, solid-state diffusion, and ionization phenomena. Developed at the many mass separators on-line to various accelerators or reactors they are today widely used to produce low-energy (10–60 keV) radioactive ion-beams for physics experiments. Since some years they have reached a stage of development that allows the production of high-intensity beams of up to 1012 ions/s of radioactive isotopes of most elements in the periodic system. Such on-line mass separators seem to be excellent injectors to a second accelerator which accelerates up to 20 MeV/u. This paper discusses the radioactive beam intensities that may be injected into proposed or working European radioactive ion-beam facilities which make use of such injectors. First a short introduction is given to the technique of on-line mass separation. This is followed by a detailed discussion of the three factors that determine the production rates in the target, i.e. reaction cross-sections, primary beam properties, and target thicknesses, and by a discussion of the more decisive factors that control the efficiency with which the radioactive nuclei produced in the target can be transformed into an injection ion-beam of typically 10–60 keV energy. Throughout the discussion the influence of new developments is assessed. Finally, selected examples of realistic beam intensities are given, which are used for intercomparison of the different production methods used by the various European projects.

References (52)

  • H.L. Ravn

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • S. Sundell et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • S. Borg et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1971)
  • P. Van Duppen

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • T. Eaton et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1987)
  • P. Hoff et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1981)
  • E. Hagebø et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • R. Kirchner

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • H.L. Ravn

    Phys. Rep.

    (1979)
  • R. Kirchner

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (1990)
  • B. Vosicki et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1981)
  • H.R. Andreasen et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1991)
  • G.D.E. Alkhazov et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1989)
  • P. Decrock et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1991)
  • P. Decrock et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • E. Kugler

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • F. Touchard et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth.

    (1981)
  • E. Kugler

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1993)
  • D. Darquennes

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1990)
  • R. Eder et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • U. Bosch et al.

    Nucl. Phys. A

    (1988)
  • B. Fogelberg et al.

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B

    (1992)
  • P. Decrock
  • E. Migneco
  • B. Jonson et al.
  • H. Doubre
  • Cited by (47)

    • High intensity targets for ISOL, historical and practical perspectives

      2008, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the 1980s, some astrophysical reaction studies were already being performed with radioactive beams produced by projectile fragmentation [4–7], however, the existing facilities could not meet the intensity requirements of many potential experiments. The requirement for higher intensity radioactive beams soon resulted in a proliferation of workshops [8–11], design studies [12,13] and facility proposals [14,15] based on using intense primary beams irradiating thick ISOL targets to produce intense RIB that could subsequently be accelerated using a second dedicated accelerator. The first 2-accelerator facility to produce RIB with high intensities for astrophysics studies was the Louvain-la-Neuve laboratory which, in 1990, used a 100 μA, 30 MeV proton beam from a cyclotron to produce 13N through the 13C(p,n)13N reaction on an enriched target [16].

    • RIB production by photofission in the framework of the ALTO project: First experimental measurements and Monte-Carlo simulations

      2008, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
    • Review of ISOL target-ion-source systems

      2003, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reason for the suppression of SbS+ must thus be instability of the molecular ions. This explanation is analogous to the one [3] for the surprising mobility of halogenes, which is most likely due to molecules formed with the omni-present alkali impurities. Also here the respective alkali-halogenide ions are not observed, although the neutral molecules are known to have a sufficient thermal stability [50].

    • An ISOL test-bench at China Institute of Atomic Energy

      2003, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
    • Yield calculations for a facility for short-lived nuclear beams

      2002, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text