AMS for M > 36 with a gas-filled magnetic spectrograph
References (23)
- et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1990) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1987) Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1986)- et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1989) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1992) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1993) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1993) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(1977)- et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1990) - et al.
Nucl. Instr. and Meth.
(1977)
Cited by (16)
Recent developments for AMS at the Munich tandem accelerator
2019, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :First experiments had entirely a nuclear physics motivation, but soon first AMS experiments were performed [3,4]. Due to the high voltage of the tandem (14 MV MP), the facility is predestined for isobaric suppression techniques which was demonstrated with a gas-filled magnetic spectrograph [5]. By the installation of the dedicated Gas-filled Magnet System (GAMS) in 1997, the tandem laboratory houses a permanent AMS experimental setup since then [6].
Developments in accelerator mass spectrometry
2013, International Journal of Mass SpectrometryCitation Excerpt :In combination with differential energy loss measurements, this can significantly improve suppression, since the parasitic ions will not degrade the detector performance [16–19]. However, this technique is most effective only at high beam energies [20,21]. In addition to active energy loss measurements, a passive degrader foil can be used to introduce selective energy loss of different elements and separate related ion beams after an energy dispersive spectrometer [22,23].
On-line ion chemistry for the AMS analysis of <sup>90</sup>Sr and <sup>135,137</sup>Cs
2013, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :Despite its ability to deal with molecular interferences, the measurement of 90Sr provided major challenges for AMS. Korschinek et al. [5] used an MP tandem with terminal voltage VT = 14 MV, a gas-filled Q3D magnetic spectrograph and a time-of-flight system to reach a detection limit of 2.6 pg/g. Three years later, Paul et al. [6] using SrH2 targets, a 12UD Pelletron with VT = 12 MV, time-of-flight and a four element gas ionization detector (3 anodes + a Si residual energy detector) reported a limit of 7.5 fg in a laboratory blank samples. Recently, Tumey et al. [7,8] using SrF2 targets, an FN tandem at VT = 9.25 MV, foil stripping to charge state 11+ and a gas ionization detector with a silicon nitride window and three anodes designed to optimize the measured energy loss difference between 90Sr and 90Zr.
AMS measurement technique after 30 years: Possibilities and limitations of low energy systems
2010, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsAccelerator mass spectrometry of strontium-90 for homeland security, environmental monitoring and human health
2008, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :The enhanced sensitivity of AMS would allow 90Sr to be used a biokinetic tracer to elucidate the functionality of strontium ranelate which would have great impact on the development of future bone related disease treatments. Based upon the encouraging experience of other AMS labs [12–14], we have begun development of 90Sr measurement capabilities at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Center for AMS (CAMS). This development has been performed using the CAMS heavy-isotope system, which is described elsewhere [15].
Computer simulation of ion-beam optics in a gas-filled magnetic spectrometer
2004, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and AtomsCitation Excerpt :The first application of a GFM for AMS was done at the Argonne National Laboratory [8] for detection of 41Ca. Since then several other installations have been reported [9–14]. The first instruments were old reoriented Enge split-pole spectrographs, Q3D, and dipole magnets, while later presented GFMs were specially designed ones (two 180° dipole magnets [10,14] and one 135° dipole magnet [13]).