Rules of engagement: Toward an analysis of staff responses to challenging behavior

https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)90008-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Through observational analysis, the actions of care staff have frequently been identified as sources of socially mediated reinforcement capable of developing and maintaining challenging behavior. Accordingly, behavioral interventions have often sought to train care staff as behavioral change agents. As yet, however, there have been few attempts to conduct full functional analyses of the behavior of care staff working with people with mental retardation and challenging behaviors. We argue that although direct contingency-shaping of staff behavior has rightly been emphasized, it is possible that many aspects of staff conduct are under the indirect control of verbal formulations. If staff behavior is rule-governed (Skinner, 1969), a range of different sources of control must be considered in a complete analysis. Using this framework, we interpret existing literature on staff behavior and identify research strategies that will extend our understanding of why staff act as they do.

References (72)

  • R.H. Bruininks et al.

    Prevalence and implications of behaviors and dual diagnosis in residential and other service programs

  • E.G. Carr

    The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1977)
  • E.G. Carr et al.

    The effects of severe behavior problems in children on the teaching behavior of adults

    Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

    (1991)
  • A.C. Catania et al.

    Properties of rule-governed behavior and their implications

  • A.C. Catania et al.

    An experimental analysis of rule-governed behavior

  • K.M. Derby et al.

    Brief functional assessment techniques to evaluate aberrant behavior in an outpatient setting: A summary of 79 cases

    Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

    (1992)
  • P.C. Duker et al.

    Analysis of ward staff initiatives towards mentally retarded residents: Clues for intervention

    Journal of Mental Deficiency Research

    (1989)
  • E. Emerson et al.

    An evaluation of hospital-based specialized housing for people with seriously challenging behaviors

    Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

    (1992)
  • E. Emerson et al.

    Challenging behaviour and community services 2: Who are the people who challenge services?

    Mental Handicap

    (1988)
  • E. Emerson et al.

    Barriers to the effective implementation of habilitative behavioral programs in an institutional setting

    Mental Retardation

    (1987)
  • A.K. Ericsson et al.

    Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data

    (1984)
  • D. Felce et al.

    To what behaviors do attending adults respond? A replication

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency

    (1987)
  • J.C. Flanagan

    The critical incident technique

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1954)
  • M.J. George et al.

    Employee withdrawal and job satisfaction in community residential facilities for mentally retarded persons

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency

    (1981)
  • E. Goffman

    Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates

    (1961)
  • I. Goldiamond

    Toward a constructional approach to social problems: Ethical and constitutional issues raised by applied behavior analysis

    Behaviorism

    (1974)
  • G.W. Grant et al.

    Resident characteristics and staff behavior in two hospitals for mentally retarded adults

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency

    (1977)
  • S. Hall et al.

    Differential effects of severe self-injurious behaviour on the behaviour of others

    Behavioural Psychotherapy

    (1992)
  • R.P. Hastings et al.

    “Is there anything on... Why ‘good’ behavioral programmes fail?”: A brief review

    Clinical Psychology Forum

    (1993)
  • R.P. Hastings et al.

    The emotional dimension of caring for people with challenging behaviors

  • Hastings, R.P., Remington, B., & Hopper, G.M. (in press). Experienced and inexperienced health care workers' beliefs...
  • S.C. Hayes

    The case of the silent dog — Verbal reports and the analysis of rules: A review of Ericsson and Simon's “Protocol Analysis: Verbal reports as data”

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

    (1986)
  • S.C. Hayes

    Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control

    (1989)
  • S.C. Hayes et al.

    Instructions, multiple schedules and extinction: Distinguishing rule-governed from schedule controlled behavior

    Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

    (1986)
  • S.C. Hayes et al.

    Avoiding and altering rule-control as a strategy of clinical intervention

  • M.G. Hile et al.

    Observing staff-resident interactions: What staff do, what residents receive

    Mental Retardation

    (1991)
  • Cited by (107)

    • The role of physiological arousal in the management of challenging behaviours in individuals with autistic spectrum disorders

      2015, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      In a reformulated cognitive behavioural framework the four key areas of the approach are (a) the reduction of staff demands and requests in a crisis; (b) the adoption of verbal and non verbal strategies that avoids potentially arousing triggers (direct eye contact, touch, avoidance of non-verbal behaviours that may lead to conflict, aggressive postures, and stances); (c) the exploration of staff beliefs about the short-term management of challenging behaviours; (d) the provision of emotional support to staff working with challenging individuals. A cognitive formulation of this model emphasises the role of staff behaviour in the maintenance of aggressive behaviour which has some support from the literature (Hastings & Brown, 2000; Hastings & Remington, 1994; Hastings, 2002; Taylor & Carr, 1992). The reduction of staff demands and requests in a crisis is a key component of a low arousal approach (McDonnell, Reeves, Johnson, & Lane, 1998; McDonnell et al., 2002) as a reduction in staff demands can lead to reductions in aggressive behaviour (Taylor & Carr, 1992).

    • Staff's attitudes and reactions towards aggressive behaviour of clients with intellectual disabilities: A multi-level study

      2013, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ajzen (1991) described ‘the subjective norm’ as the perception of general social pressures from important others to perform or not to perform a given behaviour. In line with this description, Hastings and Remington (1994) argued that the informal staff culture is the most influential external source of rules: “A group of staff working regularly together typically develops ways of dealing with incidents of such behaviour, so that all are clear about their roles” (p. 287). Noone, Jones, and Hastings (2003) investigated the influence of the informal staff culture on the perceptions of subsequent incidents of challenging behaviour in a group of apprentices, and found that the prevailing group perception of the challenging behaviour of clients with ID is likely to influence opinions provided by individual group members.

    • Training direct care staff working with persons with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: A meta-analytic review study

      2018, Aggression and Violent Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      To prevent harm to themselves, to other clients or to colleagues, and to create a safe environment, staff workers may perceive they have no alternatives than to use restrictive interventions, especially when they encounter physical aggression. Unfortunately, these interventions can be counterproductive in the long term, especially when no efforts are made to provide a functional analysis of the clients' behaviour and to provide treatment for the challenging behaviour (Hastings & Remington, 1994). The use of restrictive practices can cause persons with ID to feel unsafe, frustrated, angry, stressed and anxious, and can also cause negative experiences for staff (Fish & Culshaw, 2005; Hawkins, Allen, & Jenkins, 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Preparation of this article was supported in part by an Economic and Social Research Council studentship held by Richard Hastings.

    The authors thank Edmund Sonuga-Barke, Amina Memon, and four anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this article.

    View full text