Statistical theory of precompound reactions: The multistep compound process
References (11)
- et al.
Phys. Lett. C
(1975) - et al.
Ann. Phys. (N. Y.)
(1980) - et al.
Phys. Lett. C
(1985) Nucl. Phys. B
(1986)Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)
(1984)
Cited by (120)
Preequilibrium models for <sup>58</sup>Ni (n, xp) and <sup>60</sup>Ni (n, xp) reactions in neutrons at 8, 9, 9.4, 11 and 14.8 MeV using the EMPIRE and TALYS codes
2023, Applied Radiation and IsotopesCitation Excerpt :As shown in Fig. 9 (for 30° and 60° angles emission) and 10 (for the calculated angle integrated proton particle emission spectra at 14.8 MeV) the parameters of the optical model for neutrons (N.Yamamuro (1988)) and for protons (Koning and Delaroche (2003)) affect strongly the results. In Fig. 9 (for 120° angle emission) and 11 (for 30°, 60° and 120° angles emission), the obtained of the cross sections values for 60Ni(n, xp) reaction in terms of MSD and MSC models (Tamura et al., 1982; Nishioka et al., 1986) are in a good agreement with the experimental result (Graham et al., 1987; Grimes et al., 1979). The principal input parameters used in the two-component exciton model (Fu, 1984) calculations at the 9.4 and 11 MeV neutron incident energies for (30°, 60° and 120° angles emission) by using TALYS 1.8 code (Koning et al., 2007) are summarized in Table 4.
Isomeric cross sections of the (n, α) reactions on the <sup>90</sup>Zr, <sup>93</sup>Nb and <sup>92</sup>Mo isotopes measured for 13.73 MeV–14.77 MeV and estimated for 10 MeV–20 MeV neutron energies
2022, Applied Radiation and IsotopesCitation Excerpt :Using the consistent set of input parameters given in Table 5, the theoretical cross sections of the 92Mo(n, α)89Zrm reaction are shown in Fig. 6. In addition, the cross sections measured in the present work and those reported in literature (Amemiya et al., 1982; Filatenkov, 2016; Fujino et al., 1977; Garlea et al., 1992; Hasan et al., 1972; Ikeda et al., 1988; Kanda, 1972; Lu et al., 1970; Marcinkowski et al., 1986; Qaim et al., 1974; Rao et al., 1981; Reimer et al., 2005; Sigg and Kuroda, 1975) are also plotted in Fig. 6. The plots in Fig. 6 show that, the theoretical cross sections obtained using almost all the best options of input model parameters of EMPIRE-3.2 and TALYS-1.8 codes mentioned in Table 5 are also in good agreement with most of those reported in literature (Amemiya et al., 1982; Filatenkov, 2016; Ikeda et al., 1988; Marcinkowski et al., 1986; Sigg and Kuroda, 1975) between 13 MeV and 15.9 MeV.
Calculations for the nuclear reaction cross-sections via α-particle induced reactions on <sup>65</sup>Cu to produce impurity free <sup>67</sup>Ga for medical applications
2021, Applied Radiation and IsotopesCitation Excerpt :TALYS implemented Eric Bauge's code (Herman M. et al., 2013) as a subroutine to perform the Jeukenne-Lejeune-Mahaux (JLM) calculations. The EMPIRE 3.2.3 code comprises of various nuclear reaction models, i.e. optical model, coupled channels and distorted wave Born Approximation (DWBA) (ECIS06 and OPTMAN), Multi-step Direct (ORION + TRISTAN)(Capote R. et al., 2009), Nishioka, Verbaarschot, Weidenmuller & Yoshida (NVWY) Multi-step Compound, exciton model (PCROSS) (Nishioka H., 1986; Cline C. K., 1972), hybrid Monte Carlo simulation (DDHMS), and the full featured Hauser-Feshbach model (Feshbach H. et al., 1980). These models make EMPIRE code enable to perform calculations over a wide range of energies from a few keV to several MeV.
Nuclear model analysis of the <sup>65</sup>Cu(α, n)<sup>68</sup>Ga reaction for the production of <sup>68</sup>Ga up to 40 MeV
2021, Applied Radiation and IsotopesIntegral cross section of isomeric state formation in (neutron,nucleon) reactions using an Am–Be source
2020, Applied Radiation and Isotopes
- ∗
Now at Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.