Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution☆
References (50)
- et al.
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
(1972) - et al.
Retrieving information from Korsakoff patients: Effects of categorical cues and reference to the task
Cortex
(1973) - et al.
Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
(1984) Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
(1983)- et al.
Procedures of mind
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
(1984) - et al.
Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
(1977) - et al.
Strength and duration of priming effects in normal subjects and amnesic patients
Neuropsychologia
(1987) - et al.
Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms
Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs
(1969) Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework
Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
(1989)
On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
Specificity and generality of enhanced priming effects for self-generated study items
American Journal of Psychology
Organization in the human brain
Science
Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: Extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
The information that amnesic patients do not forget
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
Levels of processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tests
Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word superiority paradigm
Memory and Cognition
Is priming in fregment completion based on a “traceless” memory system?
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Category-item frequency and category-name meaningfulness (m′): Taxonomic norms for 84 categories
Psychonomic Monograph Supplements
Memory observed and memory unobserved
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Depth of processing and interference effects in the learning and remembering of sentences
Journal of Educational Psychology
Common and modality-specific processes in the mental lexicon
Memory and Cognition
Reprocessing text: Indirect measures of word and message level processes
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
Picture memory
Cited by (246)
Hidden costs of text-based electronic communication on complex reasoning tasks: Motivation maintenance and impaired downstream performance
2022, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesEffects of Saccade Induced Retrieval Enhancement on conceptual and perceptual tests of explicit & implicit memory
2018, Brain and CognitionCitation Excerpt :Within this, a distinction has been made between conceptual (meaning-based) and perceptual (physical feature-based) processing (Jacoby, 1983; Roediger, 1990; Roediger et al., 1989; Weldon et al., 1995).1 This framework proposes that conceptual tests are influenced by the overlap in conceptual or semantic processing between study and test (e.g., Hamann, 1990; McBride & Shoudel, 2003; Ramponi, Richardson-Klavehn, & Gardiner, 2007; Srinivas & Roediger, 1990). Conversely, other tests are perceptual and are influenced by the overlap in surface or perceptual features between study and test (e.g., Blum & Yonelinas, 2001; Craik, Moscovitch, & McDowd, 1994; Roediger et al., 1992).
Implicit Versus Explicit Memory
2017, Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive ReferenceContext-driven expectations about focus alternatives
2015, CognitionCitation Excerpt :In addition to tracking discourse mention, listeners generate expectations about candidate alternatives based on properties such as category membership. The category effects observed in Experiment 2 may be explained in part by general processes of lexical retrieval and conceptual activation required in processing a sentence (Collins & Loftus, 1975; Cree et al., 1999; Srinivas & Roediger, 1990; Tversky & Hemenway, 1984), or by semantic priming (Yee & Sedivy, 2006). However, the situation-driven effects observed in Experiment 3 suggest that comprehenders also generate alternatives on the fly, which may involve novel ad hoc categories that are determined by the constraints or goals associated with a particular discourse (see Ballard & Hayhoe, 2009 for a discussion of task effects on gaze control; also Salverda, Brown, & Tanenhaus, 2011).
Implicit Memory
2015, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition
- ☆
Part of this research was supported by NIH Grant RO1 HD15054 and was presented at the 1988 meetings of the Psychonomic Society in Chicago, and the 1989 meetings of the Midwestern Psychological Association in Chicago.