On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers☆
References (15)
The English Passive Voice
English Language Teaching
(1965)- et al.
A Frequency Count of English Tenses with Application to Teaching English as a Foreign Language
Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics
(1967) A Study of the Comparative Frequency of Passive in Some College Freshman Texts
Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics
(1977)A Verb-Form Frequency Count
English Language Teaching
(1963)- et al.
Grammar and Technical English
Time-Dependent Accretion Disks around Compact Objects. I. Theory and Basic Equations
The Astrophysical journal
(1974)- et al.
A Grammar of Contemporary English
(1972)
Cited by (117)
Citation choices in L2 novices' and experts’ literature review sections: A functional discourse analysis
2024, Journal of English for Academic PurposesTracing the development of English for Specific Purposes over four decades (1980–2019): A bibliometric analysis
2023, English for Specific PurposesESP serial publications before The ESP Journal/English for Specific Purposes: Recollections and reflections of an old-timer
2020, English for Specific PurposesCitation Excerpt :I suggest that this commonality is based, to a considerable extent, on similarities in genre across the different fields of activity, and that this gives a rough indication of the place and importance of genre in E.S.P. It has been said (by myself as well as several others) that the concept of genre was first introduced into English for Specific Purposes, independently of each other, by Swales (1981) and by Tarone, Dwyer, Gillette, and Icke (1981). It now seems that credit for the innovation really belongs to Bernard Mohan for his use of it in his 1977 TESOL presentation and subsequently published in the proceedings.
A three-dimensional model of personal self-mention in research papers
2019, English for Specific PurposesCitation Excerpt :In academic writing, authors have a choice to present themselves explicitly or hide their presence. Both choices can be realized with a range of grammatical constructions: This includes, on the one hand, impersonal means (cf. Martínez, 2001), such as nominalizations, anticipatory it (e.g. Hewings & Hewings, 2002), inanimate subjects (e.g. Master, 1991), and passive constructions (e.g. Tarone, Dwyer, Gillette, & Icke, 1981), and on the other hand, first person singular pronouns, first person plural pronouns (both reader-exclusive and reader-inclusive), self-reference words such as the author(s) or the researcher(s), and sometimes even the third person pronouns to refer to the authors’ own previous published work (Kuo, 1999; Pho, 2008). While writers typically use a number of these options in the same paper, their preference for certain means and avoidance of others reveals their affiliation with a particular social group (Ivanič & Camps, 2001).
Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap
2018, English for Specific PurposesCitation Excerpt :Third, the identification of move boundaries (i.e. the text items signalling the beginning of a move, or the transition from one move to the next; see also Paltridge, 1994: 296) could be uncertain, but was aided by a combination of bottom-up search for lexical or syntactic signals and a top-down close reading of the text for topic breaks or shifts in content. Fourth, there was a place for specialist disciplinary experts to verify the analysts' interpretations, given their deeper knowledge of the text subject matter and their stronger intuitions regarding the typical rhetorical structure and language used in good papers in their fields (e.g. Tarone, Dwyer, Gillette, & Icke, 1981). More recently, triangulation has typically involved interviews (sometimes text-based) with various participants, very often authors, but also including editors, reviewers and expert disciplinary writers (e.g. Hyland, 2012).
Examining Classroom Observation Forms in the Iranian Context: A Rhetorical Analysis of Academic Commentary in Teacher Evaluation
2023, Applied Research on English Language
- ☆
Paper presented at the 1981 TESOL Convention, Detroit. We are grateful for substantive comments on the content of this paper to Kathryn Hanges, Tom Huckin, Eric Nelson, our nonymous reviewer, and many others.