Abstract
II. IN considering the essentials of a good system of control for equatorial clocks, it is necessary to keep in view the exact conditions required. It is not sufficient that the controlling apparatus (of whatever form it may be) should simply bring the rate of the clock, which has been interfered with by some adventitious disturbance, correct once more; it must do more, it must correct this error. For, suppose a star be set on the slit of a spectroscope, and the clock started, and say, as in Dr. Huggins's case, a photographic plate inserted for a two hours' exposure. Now suppose that five minutes after the commencement of the exposure, an error of one-tenth or two-tenths of a second occurs from some disturbing cause (a fragment of dirt on the tooth of a wheel, or other cause); if the controlling apparatus be of such a nature as simply to bring the clock-rate correct again, the position of the telescope will be the above quantity, one-tenth or two-tenths of a second, in error for the remainder of the exposure, although the rate may be absolutely correct for the whole times. In other words, the star will have moved off the slit, by a quantity equivalent to what the instrument would move in one-tenth or two-tenths of a second, and will continue off the slit for the remainder of the two hours. So it will be seen that no controlling apparatus is of any use whatever, unless, as well as keeping the rate uniform, it corrects the errors that have crept in. In consequence of not keeping this point in view, many most ingenious but useless arrangements have been from time to time proposed. A little consideration will show that this arrangement meets all requirements.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GRUBB, H. Telescopes for Stellar Photography1. Nature 40, 645–649 (1889). https://doi.org/10.1038/040645d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/040645d0