Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Biochemical Specification versus Specific Regrowth in the Innervation of Skin Grafts in Anurans

Abstract

FROM studies of the reflex responses of the adult animal1–4, it seems that specification of cutaneous nerves in the anuran tadpole depends on the type of skin innervated. In the frog, Rana pipiens, in which specification does not seem to occur much before the onset of metamorphosis, rotation of large patches of back and belly skin through 180° early in larval development results in the development of white belly skin on the frog's back and dark skin on its belly. If the rotation operations are carried out early enough in larval development, the adult wiping reflex responses seem to be permanently misdirected: stimulation of the belly skin grafts results in wiping reflexes directed towards the animal's belly, whereas stimuli applied to the grafted back skin result in a reflex movement directed towards the animal's back. Tadpoles operated on in such a manner after larval stage XV5, however, develop only normal reflex behaviour2,3. Allowing 6–12 days regeneration time (R. E. B., unpublished), specification must occur at the onset of metamorphosis: stages XVIII–XXI. Local cutaneous nerves grow into the nearest available skin2–4,6 which has led to the suggestion that the maladaptive reflex behaviour results from central readjustment of synapses according to specification from the peripheral skin.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miner, N., J. Comp. Neurol., 105, 161 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobson, M., and Baker, R. E., Science, 160, 543 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobson, M., and Baker, R. E., J. Comp. Neurol., 137, 121 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, R. E., and Jacobson, M., Devel. Biol., 22, 476 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, A. C., and Kollros, J. J., Anat. Rec., 94, 7 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, R. E., J. Exp. Zool., 173, 129 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaze, R. M., Development of Neuronal Connections (Academic Press, London and New York, 1970).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Glücksmann, A., Biol. Rev., 26, 59 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hughes, A., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 9, 269 (1961).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prestige, M. C., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 18, 359 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weiss, P., and Hiscoe, H. B., J. Exp. Zool., 107, 315 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lubinska, L., Prog. Brain Res., 13, 1 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristensson, K., Acta Neuropathol., 16, 293 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sjöstrand, J., Kristensson, K., and Olsson, Y., Intern. Soc. Neurochem. Abstracts, 156 (Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1971).

  15. Sjöstrand, J., Kristensson, K., and Olsson, Y., Brain Res. (in the press).

  16. Cruickshank, C. N. D., and Harvourt, S. A., J. Invest. Derm., 42, 183 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mishima, Y., Brit. J. Derm., 79, 611 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Apter, A., J. Comp. Neurol., 70, 315 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Caston, J. D., and Singer, M., J. Neurochem., 16, 1309 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Caston, J. D., and Singer, M., Exp. Neurol., 25, 438 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Singer, M., Ciba Foundation Symposium on Growth of the Nervous System (edit. by Wolstenholme, G. E. W., and O'Connor M.), 200 (Churchill, London, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BAKER, R. Biochemical Specification versus Specific Regrowth in the Innervation of Skin Grafts in Anurans. Nature 236, 235–237 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/236235a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/236235a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing