Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Regulation of Chiasma Frequency in Lilium Microsporocytes in vitro

Abstract

WHENEVER it has been possible to test unambiguously the relationship between chiasmata and crossing over, they have been found to coincide in time and place. Evidence concerning the time of crossing over indicates that chiasma formation and genetic recombination do not occur during premeiotic DNA synthesis. Various physical and chemical agents affect recombination and chiasma formation and treatment is effective during the S phase (DNA synthesis) before leptotene and during the meiotic DNA synthesis at zygotene–pachytene. Treatment with mitomycin C and γ-rays during the S phase before leptotene has always caused a decline in chiasma frequency or recombination except in Chlamydomonas1. An increase of chiasma frequency or recombination has been found as a rule after treatment with deoxyadenosine at zygotene, again except with Chlamydomonas, when there was a decline in recombination. All these agents have been presumed primarily to affect DNA synthesis. The presence of cycloheximide at zygotene–pachytene prevents the formation of chiasmata2, which also happens when Trillium meiocytes are explantcd into culture at leptotene.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies, D. R., and Lawrence, C. W., Mutation Res., 4, 147 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roth, T. F., and Parchman, L. G., Twenty-fifth Meeting of EMSA (1967); Hotta, Y., Parchman, L. G., and Stern, H., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 60, 575 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ito, M., and Stern, H., Develop. Biol, 16, 36 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson, S. A., Nature, 211, 1043 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lawrence, C. W., Nature, 206, 789 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roth, T. F., and Ito, M., J. Cell Biol, 35, 247 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sen, S. K., Exp. Cell Res., 55, 123 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sen, S. K., Chromosoma (in the press).

  9. Hotta, Y., Ito, M., and Stern, H., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 56, 1184 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolff, S., Amer. Nat., 94, 85 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolff, S., and de Serres, F. J., Nature, 213, 1091 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SEN, S. Regulation of Chiasma Frequency in Lilium Microsporocytes in vitro. Nature 224, 178–179 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/224178a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/224178a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing