Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence for a Postsynaptic Origin of the Surface-negative Response to Direct Stimulation of the Cat's Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

ADRIAN1 first demonstrated that a surface-negative potential, lasting approximately 20 msec, is produced by a single brief electrical stimulus of weak intensity applied to the exposed cerebral cortex. This response spreads not more than 10 mm across the cortical surface, conducted along elements confined to the molecular layer (layer I) of the cortex2–4. There is disagreement as to the nature of this surface-negative response5. Some investigators have concluded that this potential is generated by the nervous processes which conduct the response2–4. Others hold that potentials generated by activity in these elements cannot be recorded at the surface and that the surface-negative response is a postsynaptic potential generated in elements other than those conducting the response6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adrian, E. D., J. Physiol., 88, 127 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burns, B. D., J. Physiol., 111, 50 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns, B. D., and Grafstein, B., J. Physiol., 118, 412 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, H. T., J. Neurophysiol., 14, 1 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bremer, F., Physiol. Rev., 38, 357 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eccles, J. C., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 3, 449 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burns, B. D., J. Physiol., 112, 156 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonnet, V., Bremer, F., and LaGrutta, G., Abstr. Intern. Congr. Physiol., 113 (1956).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FRANK, G., PINSKY, C. Evidence for a Postsynaptic Origin of the Surface-negative Response to Direct Stimulation of the Cat's Cerebral Cortex. Nature 202, 192–193 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/202192a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/202192a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing