Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Phenylquinone Writhing Test : Interpretation of Data

Nature volume 200, pages 895–896 (1963)Cite this article

Abstract

THE antagonism of phenylquinone (2-phenyl-1,4-benzoquinone)-induced writhing in mice has been recommended for investigating weak analgesic activity of new compounds1,2, but the non-specificity of this test has been emphasized by Hendershot and Forsaith3. Many compounds not considered to be analgesics, for example, parasympathomimetics, sympathomimetics and central nervous system stimulants, protect mice against the writhing induced by phenylquinone. During the routine pharmacological screening of new compounds, we observed an apparent correlation between in vitro anti-5-hydroxytryptamine activity and the ability of a compound to antagonize phenylquinone-induced writhing. Therefore, to determine more precisely the value of this test in a routine screening programme, it was decided to investigate in more detail the writhing response and its modification by compounds and procedures known to affect the activity and metabolism of biogenic amines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegmund, E., Cadmus, R., and Lu, G., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 95, 729 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll, M. N., and Limn, R. K. S., Fed. Proc., 17, 357 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hendershot, L. C., and Forsaith, J., J. Pharm. Exp. Therap., 125, 237 (1959).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Litchfield, J. T., and Wilcoxon, F., J. Pharm. Exp. Therap., 96, 99 (1949).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eckhardt, E. T., Cheplovitz, F., Lipo, M., and Govier, W. M., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 98, 186 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mead, J. A. R., and Finger, K. F., Biochem. Pharmacol., 6, 52 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Higginbotham, R. D., J. Allergy, 33, 35 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Division, Allen and Hanburys, Ltd., Ware, Hertfordshire

    R. T. BRITTAIN, D. N. LEHRER & P. S. J. SPENCER

Authors
  1. R. T. BRITTAIN
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. N. LEHRER
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. S. J. SPENCER
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BRITTAIN, R., LEHRER, D. & SPENCER, P. Phenylquinone Writhing Test : Interpretation of Data. Nature 200, 895–896 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200895b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200895b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing