ISSN:
1573-322X
Keywords:
genetic engineering
;
herbicide resistance
;
herbicide tolerant crops
;
agricultural ethics
;
morality
;
values
;
justice
;
sustainable agriculture
;
alternative agriculture
;
socio-economic effects
;
weeds
;
biotechnology
;
agribusiness
;
family farms
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Energy, Environment Protection, Nuclear Power Engineering
,
Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
,
Philosophy
Notes:
Abstract Should we continue to support publicly funded research on genetically engineered herbicide resistant crops? In Part One, I discussed the difference between science and ethics, presented a brief history of weed control, and explained three moral principles undergirding my environmentalist perspective. I then argued that unqualified endorsement (E) of the research is unjustified, as is unqualified opposition (O). In Part Two, I argue against qualified endorsement (QE), and for qualified opposition (QO).
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02014610
Permalink