ISSN:
0730-2312
Keywords:
cyclosporin A
;
cell-mediated
;
mineralization
;
marrow-stroma
;
mitochondria
;
membrane potential
;
Life and Medical Sciences
;
Cell & Developmental Biology
Source:
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
Topics:
Biology
,
Chemistry and Pharmacology
,
Medicine
Notes:
Chronic immunosuppressive treatment with cyclosporin A (CsA) is associated with decreased bone density. However, in culture, CsA inhibits osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption. This raises the question as to whether CsA also affects osteoblast function. Immunophilin, one of the CsA-binding cyclophilins that is implicated in the immunosuppressive action of CsA via calcineurin, is a peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPI). CsA also binds a mitochondrial membrane PPI which is implicated in controlling permeability transition pores. Therefore, in the present study we tested the effect of CsA on cell mediated mineralization in parallel with mitochondrial rhodamine retention as an indicator of mitochondrial membrane potential. Rat marrow stromal cells were grown in dexamethasone (DEX) medium to stimulate mineralization in culture, and CsA was added to various cultures using different treatment schedules. Low dose (0.1 μM) CsA inhibited mineralization, compared to controls, when present in the cultures during days 3-11 of DEX stimulation. Contrarily, high dose CsA (1.0 μM) resisted the inhibitory effect of the low dose. SDZ 220-384 (SDZ), a non-immunosuppressive derivative of CsA which is known, like CsA, to bind to mitochondrial cyclophilin but does not inhibit calcineurin, was also tested. Both high and low doses of SDZ decreased mineralization when present in the cultures from day 3 or from day 0. The similar effect of the low CsA dose and SDZ on mineralization is in accord with their ability to block permeability transition pores. The differential effect, on day 21 mineralization, between high CsA dose and SDZ took place in parallel to their opposing effects on mitochondrial membrane potential. On days 4-8, mitochondrial rhodamine retention was higher under CsA than under SDZ. Under these conditions there was no significant difference between the effects of these drugs on cell proliferation measured on day 11; there was a minor decrease in specific alkaline phosphatase activity by SDZ, too small to explain the extent of mineralization inhibition by SDZ. These results suggest that permeability transition pores might be involved in controlling mineralization. Unlike SDZ, CsA exhibits an additional effect on the mitochondrial membrane potential and on mineralization when applied at a high dose on day 3. Therefore identifying the additional activity of high dose CsA, which is missing in SDZ, may be beneficial. Such activity is expected to resist changes in rhodamine retention and decreased mineralization induced by SDZ, and yet enable preservation of immunosuppressive activity of CsA. J. Cell. Biochem. 64:209-216. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Material:
5 Ill.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
