ISSN:
0271-2091
Keywords:
Three Dimensional Flow
;
Turbine Draft Tube
;
Curvilinear Co-ordinates
;
Engineering
;
Engineering General
Source:
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
Topics:
Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science, Production Engineering, Mining and Metallurgy, Traffic Engineering, Precision Mechanics
Notes:
The three-dimensional turbulent flow in a curved hydraulic turbine draft tube is studied numerically. The analysis is based on the steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations closed with the κ-ε model. The governing equations are discretized by a conservative finite volume formulation on a non-orthogonal body-fitted co-ordinate system. Two grid systems, one with 34 × 16 × 12 nodes and another with 50 × 30 × 22 nodes, have been used and the results from them are compared. In terms of computing effort, the number of iterations needed to yield the same degree of convergence is found to be proportional to the square root of the total number of nodes employed, which is consistent with an earlier study made for two-dimensional flows using the same algorithm. Calculations have been performed over a wide range of inlet swirl, using both the hybrid and second-order upwind schemes on coarse and fine grids. The addition of inlet swirl is found to eliminate the stalling characteristics in the downstream region and modify the behaviour of the flow markedly in the elbow region, thereby affecting the overall pressure recovery noticeably. The recovery factor increases up to a swirl ratio of about 0·75, and then drops off. Although the general trends obtained with both finite difference operators are in agreement, the quantitative values as well as some of the fine flow structures can differ. Many of the detailed features observed on the fine grid system are smeared out on the coarse grid system, pointing out the necessity of both a good finite difference operator and a good grid distribution for an accurate result.
Additional Material:
21 Ill.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650061202
