Library

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Key words Airway occlusion pressure ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Extubation ; Non-invasive ventilation ; Respiratory insufficiency
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective: To examine variables associated with postextubation respiratory distress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Design: Prospective, clinical investigation. Setting: Intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients: Forty COPD patients, considered ready for extubation. Measurements and main results: We recorded, from the digital display of a standard ventilator, breathing frequency (f), tidal volume (VT) and f/VT for the respiratory pattern, airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 s (P0.1) for the respiratory drive and measured blood gases : i) before extubation, following 30 min of a 6 cm H2O pressure support (PS) ventilation trial, ii) 1 h after extubation, at the 30th min of a face mask 4 cm H2O PS ventilation trial. According to the weaning outcome, the patients were divided into two groups : respiratory distress, and non-respiratory distress within 72 h of the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. The respiratory distress was defined as the combination of f more than 25 breaths/min, an increase in PaCO2 of at least 20 % compared with the value measured after extubation, and pH lower than 7.35. We determined whether those patients who developed respiratory distress after extubation differed from those who did not. Respiratory pattern data and arterial blood gases recorded, either before or after extubation, and P0.1 recorded before extubation, were inadequate to differentiate the two groups. Only P0.1 recorded 1 h after the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation differentiated the patients who developed respiratory distress from those who did not (4.2 ± 0.9 vs 1.8 ± 0.8, p 〈 0.01). Conclusions: P0.1 recorded after extubation may be a good indicator of postextubation respiratory distress. Measuring P0.1 and/or the analysis of the evolution of this parameter could facilitate decisions during the period following extubation.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...