Electronic Resource
New York
:
Cambridge University Press
Church history
42 (1973), S. 335-349
ISSN:
0009-6407
Source:
Cambridge Journals Digital Archives
Topics:
History
,
Theology and Religious Studies
Notes:
A good deal of literature has dealt with the relationship between the works of John Wyclif and John Hus. It seems clear now that John Hus did not simply parrot Wyclif as Johann Loserth argued in the nineteenth century, but rather he was the product of a native Bohemian reform movement. He regarded Wyclif as a fellow reformer and was reliant on him for much of his realist philosophy and ecclesiology but was largely independent of Wyclif in matters of dogmatic theology. Concerning the eucharist, for example, Hus clearly accepted the Roman doctrine of transubstantiation rather than Wyclif's remanence.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3164390
| Library |
Location |
Call Number |
Volume/Issue/Year |
Availability |
