Library

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of clinical pharmacology 26 (1984), S. 613-617 
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: atropine ; radioreceptor assay ; radioimmunoassay ; serum levels ; pharmacokinetics ; assay comparison
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary A membrane suspension prepared from rat brain was able to bind the potent muscarinic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB). The KD for binding was 0.48 nM and Bmax was 1.42 pmol/mg protein. Atropine competitively inhibited the binding of tritiated QNB to muscarinic receptors. This new radioreceptor assay (RRA) for atropine has been compared with a radioimmunoassay (RIA) for atropine. The RRA measures only the active component of atropine, 1-hyscyamine and in this respect it differs from the RIA. As little atropine as 1.25 ng/ml (4.33 nmol/l) in a 25 µl serum sample could be reliably assayed by the RRA. Using both assay techniques the pharmacokinetics of atropine was studied after a single 0.02 mg/kg i.v. dose given to 8 anaesthetized patients. The half-life calculated by the RRA was 3.7±2.3 h (m ± SD) and by the RIA 4.3±1.7 h. Both the volume of distribution and the total clearance were higher according to the RRA than the RIA: 3.9±1.5 vs 1.7±0.71/kg and 15.4±10.3 vs 5.9±3.6 ml/min/kg, respectively. The AUC measured by the RRA and RIA was 29.8±18.9 and 103.9±110.7 µg·h/l, respectively. The differences in the pharmacokinetics according to the 2 methods are presumably due to preferential tissue uptake of the l-form.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...