ISSN:
1432-1076
Keywords:
Key words Bladder exstrophy
;
Interpersonal relations
;
Sexual
;
behaviour
;
Fertility and education
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Abstract After primary bladder closure or urinary diversion, other factors apart from the reconstruction itself gain importance for individuals with the exstrophy-epispadias complex: social integration and, after reaching puberty, sexuality and fertility. Between 1968 and July 1994 115 patients with bladder exstrophy or incontinent epispadias underwent surgery at our institution. A total of 104 patients could be followed, 2 of whom died in the meantime. Of the remaining 102 patients 48 attend school, 4 are in college, 40 have completed or are currently undergoing vocational training, 3 are unemployed, 1 lives in a therapeutic centre and 6 are younger than 6 years of age. A total of 95% of the patients with continent urinary diversion are continent day and night, whereas only three of five patients with a sling plasty (incontinent epispadias) or with primary bladder closure followed by a Young-Dees procedure are continent. None of the patients showed deterioration of renal function. In 25 females the external genitalia were reconstructed. Fixation of the uterus was done in 13 to correct or prevent uterine prolapse. Of the 17 women older than 18 years of age with genital reconstruction, 16 are satisfied with the cosmetic result. All adults engage in sexual intercourse. Five women have delivered seven children by Caesarean section. Of the 35 male adults 32 underwent reconstruction of the external genitalia and 34 males achieve erection. One developed necrosis of the penis early in life following primary bladder closure performed at an outside hospital. Penile deviation was present in 11 of the 32 patients with genital reconstruction, which is distressing in only 2. Thirty patients are satisfied with the cosmetic result. After genital reconstruction 9 males developed epididymitis, necessitating two orchiectomies and three vasectomies. No patient with reconstruction of the external genitalia can ejaculate normally or has fathered children, whereas ejaculation was normal in the three men who did not undergo genital reconstruction and in two patients prior to post-pubertal reconstruction. Furthermore, two of these three men have fathered four children. Conclusion Education, occupation and social development of patients with urinary diversion are uneventful. The cosmetic results achieved by genital reconstruction are satisfactory. In female patients, antefixation of the uterus should be performed before or together with an introitusplasty to prevent uterine prolapse. In male patients, however, surgery is performed at the expense of fertility. Detailed discussions with the patients and their parents should include not only the question of primary bladder closure versus urinary diversion, but also the pros and cons of correction of the external and – in females – the internal genitalia.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01957152
