Library

X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Reticulospinal excitation and inhibition of neck motoneurons (1978)
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 32 (1978), S. 471-489 
    Details
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Reticulospinal ; Monosynaptic ; Excitation ; Inhibition ; Neck motoneurons
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Responses of neck motoneurons to electrical stimulation of the pontomedullary reticular formation were recorded intracellularly in cerebellectomized cats anesthetized with chloralose. Stimulation of nucleus reticularis (n.r.) ventralis and the dorsal part of n.r. gigantocellularis evoked short latency, monosynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in the majority of motoneurons supplying the ipsilateral splenius, biventer cervicis and complexus muscles and in 25% of motoneurons projecting in the ipsilateral spinal accessory nerve. Monosynaptic IPSPs were also evoked by stimulating the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) but lesion and collision experiments indicated that these IPSPs were independent of those evoked by reticular stimulation. Monosynaptic IPSPs were also occasionally observed following stimulation of the contralateral reticular formation, especially of the dorsal part of n.r. gigantocellularis. Monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were evoked in all classes of neck motoneurons studied by stimulation of n.r. pontis caudalis, gigantocellularis and ventralis. Each reticular nucleus appeared to contribute to this excitation. The excitation was bilateral but large monosynaptic EPSPs were most often seen in motoneurons ipsilateral to the stimulus site. Data indicated that pontine EPSPs were mediated by ventromedial reticulospinal fibers while medullary EPSPs were mediated by ventrolateral reticulospinal fibers. Neck motoneurons thus receive at least three distinct direct reticulospinal inputs, two excitatory and one inhibitory.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00239548
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Reticulospinal connections with limb and axial motoneurons (1979)
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 36 (1979), S. 1-20 
    Details
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Reticulospinal ; Excitation ; Inhibition ; Axial motoneurons ; Limb motoneurons
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Responses of motoneurons supplying muscles of the forelimbs, hindlimbs, back, and neck to stimulation of the medial pontomedullary reticular formation were studied with intracellular recording in cere-bellectomized cats under chloralose anesthesia. Stimulation of the midline or of a reticular region consisting of nucleus reticularis (n.r.) pontis caudalis and the dorsorostral part of n.r. gigantocellularis produced monosynaptic excitation of ipsilateral motoneurons supplying axial muscles and flexor and extensor muscles in both proximal and distal parts of the limbs. This widespread excitation appears to have been produced by rapidly conducting medial reticulospinal fibers. Stimulation of a second region consisting of n.r. ventralis and the ventrocaudal part of n. r. gigantocellularis produced monosynaptic excitation of ipsilateral neck and back motoneurons but only longer latency, apparently multisynaptic excitation of limb motoneurons. Collision tests indicated that this monosynaptic excitation did not involve fibers descending along the midline. It therefore appears to have been produced by lateral reticulospinal fibers. Reticular stimulation also produced short latency, monosynaptic inhibition of neck motoneurons, long latency, apparently polysynaptic inhibition of limb motoneurons and intermediate latency inhibition of back motoneurons. The latencies and properties of inhibitory responses of back motoneurons indicated that they were produced either disynaptically by fast fibers or monosynaptically by slower fibers. The data indicate that the medial pontomedullary reticular formation can be divided into a number of different zones each with a distinct pattern of connections with somatic motoneurons. These include the dorsorostrally located medial reticulospinal projection area, from which direct excitation of a wide variety of motoneurons can be evoked, the ventrocaudally located lateral reticulospinal projection area from which direct excitation of neck and back and direct inhibition of neck motoneurons can be evoked and the dorsal strip of n.r. gigantocellularis which has direct excitatory and inhibitory actions only on neck motoneurons.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00238464
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Vestibular responses and branching of interstitiospinal neurons (1980)
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 40 (1980), S. 131-145 
    Details
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Interstitiospinal neurons ; Vestibular system ; Semicircular canal inputs ; Axon branching
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary 1. Interstitiospinal neurons were activated by antidromic stimulation of the ventromedial funiculus of the spinal cord at C1 and C4 in cerebellectomized cats under chloralose anesthesia. 46% of these neurons responded only at C1 (N cells) and the remaining 54% responded at C4 also (D cells). There is no topographical difference in the location of N and D cells. Conduction velocities of N cells were significantly slower than those of D cells. 2. Stimulation of the contralateral whole vestibular nerve evoked firing of 31% of both N and D cells; some responded early enough to suggest disynaptic connections, many responded late. Stimulation of the ipsilateral whole vestibular nerve evoked firing of several cells, one spontaneously discharging D cell was inhibited. 3. Stimulation of the contralateral individual semicircular canal nerves evoked firing of 33% of N cells and 13% of D cells. Most of these responses were late. N cells responded not only to the vertical canals but also to the horizontal canal, whereas D cells responded to the horizontal canal, but seldom to the vertical ones. Most canal responding neurons received specific input, only two N cells received convergent input from both the anterior and horizontal canals. Stimulation of the ipsilateral canals did not evoke excitation of any cells tested; one D cell was inhibited by stimulation of the horizontal canal nerve. 4. Stimulation of the rostral medial vestibular nucleus evoked characteristic negative field potentials centered in the contralateral interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC). Approximately 60% of both N and D cells received excitation from the contralateral vestibular nuclei. About 17% of these responding neurons received monosynaptic excitation, most frequently from the rostral medial nucleus. Stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei evoked firing of 12% of both N and D cells. 5. Twenty-nine neurons were fired antidromically by weak stimuli applied to the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei. Twenty-seven of the 29 were activated only from C1 and were found in the INC (10 cells) and in the reticular formation dorsal to the INC (19 cells). Measurement of the spread of the effect of stimulus current and comparison of latencies to stimulation of the vestibular nuclei and C1 indicated that these neurons have axon collaterals going to the ipsilateral vestibular nuclei. Only one of them received excitation from the contralateral posterior canal, others did not respond to the labyrinth. Some were activated by stimulation of the vestibular nuclei.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00237531
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Location and vestibular responses of interstitial and midbrain reticular neurons that project to the vestibular nuclei in the cat (1982)
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 45 (1982), S. 303-312 
    Details
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Midbrain reticular formation ; Interstitio-vestibular neurons ; Vestibular system ; Semicircular canal inputs ; Axon branching
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Experiments were performed on cats anesthetized with a chloralose to locate neurons in and around the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC) that project to the vestibular nuclei, and to study labyrinthine inputs to these neurons. Neurons that project to the vestibular nuclei were identified by microstimulation confined to the vestibular nuclei on both sides. All neurons thus identified were activated antidromically from the ipsilateral (but not contralateral) vestibular nuclei. Vestibular projecting neurons were found in the INC and the reticular formation rostral, dorsal and caudal to the INC. About 23% of these neurons were vestibular branching spinal projecting neurons. The median conduction velocity of vestibular projecting neurons was estimated to be in the neighborhood of 12–16 m/s. Stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve evoked firing in 29% of neurons projecting to the vestibular nuclei, but not to the spinal cord. Interstitial neurons responded more frequently than reticular neurons (45% vs 11%, χ2 test, p 〈 0.001). By stimulation of individual semicircular canal nerves, it was shown that vestibular projecting neurons receive excitation from the contralateral vertical canals, but do not receive substantial inputs from the horizontal canal. Stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve excited 10% of neurons; suppression of activity was observed for six cells and four of the six were excited by stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve. Stimulation of ipsilateral individual semicircular canal nerves did not excite any cells tested; the activity of a few cells was suppressed by stimulation of the vertical canal nerves. One neuron received excitation from the contralateral anterior canal and suppression from the ipsilateral posterior canal. Vestibular branching spinal projecting neurons rarely received labyrinthine inputs as already reported (Fukushima et al. 1980a). These results suggest that vestibular projecting neurons may be involved in vertical vestibular reflexes.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00235791
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...