ISSN:
1432-1106
Keywords:
Directional specificity
;
Receptive field organization
;
Opponent processesLateral suprasylvian area
;
Cat
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Summary For the experiments reported in this study, recordings were obtained from 246 single units in the middle lateral suprasylvian visual area (LS) of 13 cats. 49 of these cells were subjected to detailed quantitative analysis. The receptive field (RF) organization was examined for directionally specific cells by presenting moving single spots on large moving random dot backgrounds. A cell's response to an optimal spot (in terms of size, direction, velocity) moving on a stationary background inside the excitatory RF (ERF) was compared to in-phase (same direction, same velocity) and anti-phase (opposite direction, same velocity) movement of spot and background. In-phase movement resulted in inhibition of the cell's response (3–100%) in 94% of the cells, while anti-phase movement led to reduced inhibition in 52% of the cells or to facilitation (0.5–327%) in 39% of the cells. By changing the direction of background motion with respect to that of the spot, the directional tuning of the in-phase inhibition and anti-phase facilitation effects was determined. We were able to manipulate the size of the background effects by masking out the background for various proportions of the ERF, and maximizing them by restricting background stimulation to the large inhibitory RF (IRF) surrounding the ERF. These results could be best accounted for by a double-opponent-process mechanism with both RF center and RF surround being directionally selective, but with opposite polarity. It is suggested that this type of mechanism could be involved in the processing of object motion.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00235544
Permalink
