Library

Description: Die vorliegende Arbeit befasst sich mit Primalheuristiken für gemischt-ganzzahlige, lineare Optimierungsprobleme (engl.: mixed integer program MIP). Zahlreiche Optimierungsprobleme aus der Praxis lassen sich als MIP modellieren, Beispiele hierfür sind u. a. Optimierungsprobleme im öffentlichen Nah- und Fernverkehr, bei logistischen Fragestellungen oder im Bereich der Chip-Verifikation. Das Lösen von MIP ist NP-schwer und wird heutzutage meistens mit Hilfe von Branch-and-Bound-basierenden Algorithmen versucht. Das Branch-and-Bound-Ver\-fah\-ren profitiert unter Umständen von bereits frühzeitig zur Verfügung stehenden Lösungen, daher sind wir sehr an heuristischen Verfahren interessiert, die in der Praxis schnell eine gute Lösung für eine große Zahl an MIPs liefern und somit die Lösezeit des Branch-and-Bound-Verfahrens erheblich beschleunigen können. Primalheuristiken sind Suchverfahren zum Auffinden zulässiger Lösungen eines MIP. Verschiedene Typen von Primalheuristiken sollen dabei den jeweiligen Bedarf des Anwenders zu unterschiedlichen Zeiten während der Branch-and-Bound-Suche decken. Während Start- und Rundeheuristiken zu Beginn des Löseprozesses eine große Rolle bei der Suche nach der ersten zulässigen Lösung haben, arbeiten Verbesserungs-heuristiken auf schon bekannten Lösungen, um neue, bessere Lösungen zu produzieren. Diese Arbeit beschäftigt sich mit Primalheuristiken, welche Teil des MIP-Lösers SCIP sind. Im ersten Kapitel werden nach der Erarbeitung grundlegender Definitionen viele der durch Tobias Achterberg und Timo Berthold in SCIP integrierten heuristischen Verfahren vorgestellt und kategorisiert. Auf dieser Grundlage bauen dann die Kapitel 2-4 der Arbeit auf. In diesen werden drei zusätzliche Heuristiken vorgestellt, im Einzelnen sind dies ZI Round, eine Rundeheuristik, welche zuerst von Wallace beschrieben wurde, außerdem eine 2-Opt-Heuristik für MIP und eine neue Startheuristik, Shift-And-Propagate. Großer Wert wird in jedem Kapitel auf die algorithmische Beschreibung der Heuristiken gelegt, die stets anhand von motivierenden Beispielen eingeführt und anhand von Pseudocode-Algorithmen begleitet werden. Zusätzlich enthält jedes Kapitel Auswertungen der mit den neuen Heuristiken gemessenen Ergebnisse von SCIP. Eine kurze Zusammenfassung in Kapitel 5 schließt diese Arbeit ab.

Description: Many practically relevant problems can be formulated in terms of a mixed integer programming (MIP) model. MIP denotes the optimization of a linear objective function under a certain number of linear side constraints including the need for some of the involved variables to take integral solution values. Applications of MIP based optimization can be found in the area of public transit, scheduling, automatic vehicle routing, network design, etc. From a complexity point of view, MIP solving is known to be NP-hard and most commonly tried to be solved via Branch-and-Bound based algorithms. Branch-and-Bound algorithms benefit from early and good feasible solutions of a MIP in various ways. Primal heuristics are aimed at finding new solutions during the MIP solving process. There are different types of primal heuristics: while start heuristics are particularly valuable to find an early solution, improvement heuristics hopefully drive a given solution further towards optimality. This thesis focusses on primal heuristics which are part of the MIP-solving framework SCIP. The first chapter comes with basic definitions and a brief description of SCIP and the test set which we used. The remainder of the first chapter is an overview of the existing heuristics in SCIP which have been implemented by Achterberg and Berthold. In the following chapters we introduce three new heuristics which apply rounding or propagation techniques for their specific purpose, namely the new rounding heuristic ZI Round, taken from Wallace, a 2-Opt improvement heuristic for MIP and the propagation heuristic Shift-and-Propagate. It is characteristic of all three heuristics that they mainly apply computationally inexpensive algorithms. Each of them is presented in an own chapter, starting with an algorithmic description, followed by implementational details. All chapters close with a discussion of the computational results obtained with the respective implementations in SCIP.

Description: Modern MIP solving software incorporates dozens of auxiliary algorithmic components for supporting the branch-and-bound search in finding and improving solutions and in strengthening the relaxation. Intuitively, a dynamic solving strategy with an appropriate emphasis on different solving components and strategies is desirable during the search process. We propose an adaptive solver behavior that dynamically reacts on transitions between the three typical phases of a MIP solving process: The first phase objective is to find a feasible solution. During the second phase, a sequence of incumbent solutions gets constructed until the incumbent is eventually optimal. Proving optimality is the central objective of the remaining third phase. Based on the MIP-solver SCIP, we demonstrate the usefulness of the phase concept both with an exact recognition of the optimality of a solution, and provide heuristic alternatives to make use of the concept in practice.

Description: Modern MIP solvers employ dozens of auxiliary algorithmic components to support the branch-and-bound search in finding and improving primal solutions and in strengthening the dual bound. Typically, all components are tuned to minimize the average running time to prove optimality. In this article, we take a different look at the run of a MIP solver. We argue that the solution process consists of three different phases, namely achieving feasibility, improving the incumbent solution, and proving optimality. We first show that the entire solving process can be improved by adapting the search strategy with respect to the phase-specific aims using different control tunings. Afterwards, we provide criteria to predict the transition between the individual phases and evaluate the performance impact of altering the algorithmic behavior of the MIP solver SCIP at the predicted phase transition points.

Description: Primal heuristics are an important component of state-of-the-art codes for mixed integer programming. In this paper, we focus on primal heuristics that only employ computationally inexpensive procedures such as rounding and logical deductions (propagation). We give an overview of eight different approaches. To assess the impact of these primal heuristics on the ability to find feasible solutions, in particular early during search, we introduce a new performance measure, the primal integral. Computational experiments evaluate this and other measures on MIPLIB~2010 benchmark instances.

Description: Primal heuristics are an important component of state-of-the-art codes for mixed integer programming. In this paper, we focus on primal heuristics that only employ computationally inexpensive procedures such as rounding and logical deductions (propagation). We give an overview of eight different approaches. To assess the impact of these primal heuristics on the ability to find feasible solutions, in particular early during search, we introduce a new performance measure, the primal integral. Computational experiments evaluate this and other measures on MIPLIB~2010 benchmark instances.

Description: We propose a simple and general online method to measure the search progress within the Branch-and-Bound algorithm, from which we estimate the size of the remaining search tree. We then show how this information can help solvers algorithmically at runtime by designing a restart strategy for Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) solvers that decides whether to restart the search based on the current estimate of the number of remaining nodes in the tree. We refer to this type of algorithm as clairvoyant. Our clairvoyant restart strategy outperforms a state-of-the-art solver on a large set of publicly available MIP benchmark instances. It is implemented in the MIP solver SCIP and will be available in future releases.

Description: The SCIP Optimization Suite is a software toolbox for generating and solving various classes of mathematical optimization problems. Its major components are the modeling language ZIMPL, the linear programming solver SoPlex, the constraint integer programming framework and mixed-integer linear and nonlinear programming solver SCIP, the UG framework for parallelization of branch-and-bound-based solvers, and the generic branch-cut-and-price solver GCG. It has been used in many applications from both academia and industry and is one of the leading non-commercial solvers. This paper highlights the new features of version 3.2 of the SCIP Optimization Suite. Version 3.2 was released in July 2015. This release comes with new presolving steps, primal heuristics, and branching rules within SCIP. In addition, version 3.2 includes a reoptimization feature and improved handling of quadratic constraints and special ordered sets. SoPlex can now solve LPs exactly over the rational number and performance improvements have been achieved by exploiting sparsity in more situations. UG has been tested successfully on 80,000 cores. A major new feature of UG is the functionality to parallelize a customized SCIP solver. GCG has been enhanced with a new separator, new primal heuristics, and improved column management. Finally, new and improved extensions of SCIP are presented, namely solvers for multi-criteria optimization, Steiner tree problems, and mixed-integer semidefinite programs.