Library

X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1995-1999  (2)
  • Interobserver variation  (1)
  • Trial design  (1)
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Interobserver agreement for diagnostic MRI criteria in suspected multiple sclerosis (1999)
    Springer
    Neuroradiology 41 (1999), S. 347-350 
    Details
    ISSN: 1432-1920
    Keywords: Key words Multiple sclerosis ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Interobserver variation
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract MRI is the paraclinical test most widely used to support the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). We evaluated interobserver agreement in applying diagnostic criteria to MRI obtained at first presentation. Five experienced observers scored 25 sets of images consisting of unenhanced T2- and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images (approximately half the sets were normal). We scored frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, infratentorial and basal ganglia lesions and the total number of lesions on T2-weighted images; periventricular, callosal, juxtacortical and ovoid lesions and those 〉 5 mm in maximum diameter; contrast-enhancing and hypointense lesions. Based on a combination of imaging findings patients were classified as compatible or not compatible with MS according to composite criteria. Observer concordance was characterised by weighted kappa values (ϰ) and mean average difference to the median (MADM) scores. Using the raw scores, there was poor agreement for the total number of lesions on T2-weighted images, and for occipital, oval, juxtacortical and hypointense lesions. Moderate agreement was found for frontal, callosal, basal ganglia and large lesions on T2 weighting. Good agreement was attained for parietal, temporal, infratentorial and periventricular lesions. After dichotomisation according to accepted cut-off values, most criteria performed better, especially the number of lesions on T2-weighted images (P 〈 0.05). Good agreement was found for the criteria of Paty and Fazekas and moderate agreement for those of Barkhof. While experienced observers may not agree on the total number of lesions, they show quite good agreement for commonly used cut-off points and elements in the composite criteria. This validates the use of MRI in the diagnosis of MS, and the use of dichotomised and composite criteria.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002340050762
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Strategies for optimizing MRI techniques aimed at monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis treatment trials (1997)
    Springer
    Journal of neurology 244 (1997), S. 76-84 
    Details
    ISSN: 1432-1459
    Keywords: Key words Multiple sclerosis ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Trial design
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detects substantial subclinical disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is presently included in most treatment trials as an objective outcome measure. Our current knowledge of the role of MRI in MS treatment trials is derived from very limited patient studies, and the aim of this paper is to identify strategies to optimize the use of MRI in monitoring disease activity in treatment trials. The number of active lesions revealed by MRI can be used as the primary outcome measure in exploratory treatment trials. With monthly scanning, the majority of active lesions will be seen by virtue of a limited number of new areas of gadolinium enhancement. The contrast between enhancing lesions and background could be increased by: (1) using higher doses of gadolinium, (2) suppressing the background signal with magnetization transfer, (3) delayed scanning, or (4) a combination of these. Following a systematic comparison of those approaches, the effect on the sensitivity in detecting active lesions should be analysed with reference to the power of treatment trials. We present preliminary results showing marked agreement between observers in reporting enhancing lesions; however, with new acquisition strategies, the observer variation should be re-established in a multicentre fashion. In definitive trials, the increase in total lesion load serves as a secondary outcome measure. Since the majority of lesions making up the total lesion load are inactive during the study, spatial resolution should be maximized in order to preclude any artificial changes in lesion load to be superimposed (noise) upon the relatively small actual change (information). Reduction in measurement error can be attempted by improved acquisition techniques with increased lesion to background contrast. More importantly, improvement in quantitation techniques is warranted. With a 6% coefficient of variation in measuring a baseline lesion load, we calculate the standard error of the mean yearly increase in T2 lesion load (typically 10% in untreated patients) in a treatment arm of 124 patients to be 7.5%. A comparison of several quantitation techniques should be performed in a multicentre longitudinal fashion in order to include variation caused by both scanner and segmentation technique, in addition to biological activity.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004150050053
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...