Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Acidic Drugs  (1)
  • Amidopyrine  (1)
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology 281 (1974), S. 197-217 
    ISSN: 1432-1912
    Keywords: Intestinal Absorption ; Acidic Drugs ; Benzoic Acid ; Salicylic Acid ; Solvent Drag ; Rat
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary 1. Jejunal loops of anaesthetized rats were perfused with hypotonic, isotonic and hypertonic buffered solutions containing 14C-labelled benzoic acid and salicylic acid at pH 6.2 and 2.2. The blood flow of the loop was maintained at an intermediate rate (0.78–0.97 ml min−1 g−1). The water net flux was determined by polyethylene glycol as non-absorbable marker and amounted up to +31 or-27 μl min−1 g−1. 2. A positive water net flux (leaving the gut lumen) increased the appearance rate of benzoic acid and salicylic acid in the intestinal venous blood by maximally 47 and 41%, a negative water net flux (entering the gut lumen) diminished the appearance rate by 28 and 37%. 3. The experimental data were analysed by means of a kinetic model. The parameters of the model were the epithelial permeability kF D , the serosal permeability k S F S and the sieving coefficient Φ=1−σ. The epithelial permeability was 0.115 and 0.107 for benzoic acid and salicylic acid at pH 6.2 and increased to 0.163 and 0.185 ml min−1 g−1 at pH 2.2. The serosal permeability was assumed to be identical for neutral and acidic pH and amounted to 0.046 and 0.112 ml min−1 g−1 indicating that a certain proportion of the absorbed drugs was transferred to the serosal side. The sieving coefficient was 2.92 and 2.31 at neutral pH and 3.79 and 3.56 at acidic pH. 4. The main resistance to the absorption of the two drugs is the epithelial membrane, since the effective blood flow and the unstirred layer are not ratelimiting. The high sieving coefficient for the two drugs is interpreted as indicating an interaction of drug and water molecules inside the lipid part of the cell membrane (which contains at least 30% water). The electric potential across the gut wall may contribute to the size of the sieving coefficient, if the drug molecules permeate also in the ionized form. 5. Using acidic perfusion solutions the epithelial permeability and the sieving coefficient were increased by the factor 1.3–1.5. This increase can be explained sufficiently by a facilitated entrance of the unionized drug molecules into the epithelial membrane.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology 281 (1974), S. 175-196 
    ISSN: 1432-1912
    Keywords: Intestinal Absorption ; Basic Drugs ; Amidopyrine ; Antipyrine ; Solvent Drag ; Rat
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary 1. Jejunal loops of anaesthetized rats were perfused with hypotonic, isotonic and hypertonic buffered solutions containing 14C-labelled amidopyrine and antipyrine at neutral and at acidic pH. The blood flow of the loop was maintained at an intermediate rate (0.7–1.0 ml min−1g−1). The water net flux was determined by means of polyethylene glycol as non-absorbable marker and amounted up to ±30 μl min−1g−1. 2. A positive water net flux (directed towards the blood) increased the appearance rate of amidopyrine and antipyrine by maximally 43.8 and 49.2%, a negative water net flux (directed towards the gut lumen) diminished it by 38.8 and 35.0%. 3. The experimental data were analysed by means of a kinetic model with the water net flux as independent variable and the epithelial permeability kF D , the serosal permeability k S F S and the sieving coefficient Φ=1−σ as absorption parameters. For antipyrine independent of the pH-value of the perfusion solution kF D was 0.123, and, for amidopyrine at pH 7 and pH 3 kF D was 0.231 and 0.091, respectively. k S F S was zero indicating that in this experimental arrangement the transfer of drug molecules to the serosal side was negligible. The sieving coefficient Φ amounted to 2.30 for amidopyrine and 2.15 for antipyrine at neutral pH. At acidic pH it amounted to 0.50 for amidopyrine and 1.44 for antipyrine. The hydraulic permeability of water was identical at neutral and acidic pH. 4. The high sieving coefficient for the two drugs at neutral pH is interpreted as indicating that water and lipophilic drug molecules interact within the lipid part of the cell membrane. At acidic pH the ionized drug molecules appear to permeate the cell membrane preferentially across other (presumably more hydrophilic) areas.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...