Library

X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Epidemiological approaches to primary and secondary prevention of cancer (1991)
    Springer
    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 117 (1991), S. 177-185 
    Details
    ISSN: 1432-1335
    Keywords: Cancer control ; Breast cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; Primary prevention ; Screening
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Primary prevention of cancer requires control of both involuntary and voluntary exposures. Involuntary exposures include carcinogens in air and water, and various forms of radiation. Often these exposures are difficult to characterise individually and difficult to study epidemiologically. Although it is unlikely that they account for more than a small proportion of cancers, it is important that we refine our techniques of study to facilitate their control. Voluntary (lifestyle) exposures are responsible for the majority of cancers. In many developed countries, tobacco accounts for approximately 30% of cancer deaths, and major public health endeavours are justified to reduce this toll. Dietary factors may be as important, with dietary fat the most important risk factor, vegetables and fruits being protective. In several studies, including a cohort study in Canada, dietary fat increases breast cancer risk, though other studies have been negative. The evidence for fat increasing the risk of colorectal is more consistent. Epidemiology has shown that secondary prevention of cancer is applicable by screening for breast cancer with mammography with or without physical examination in women age 50–69, and screening for cervix cancer in women age 25–60 with cervical cytology. Organised screening programmes are essential to ensure that a high proportion of women are screened, and that the tests are high quality with adequate quality control. Under these circumstances screening every 2 years for breast cancer and every 3 years for cervix cancer is cost-effective. Screening for other cancers cannot be recommended currently. There is a time to effect that must be recognised in planning primary or secondary prevention. Full effect of most primary activities will not be achieved for decades, screening may require a decade. Available knowledge must be applied now, however, to ensure the effect will eventually be seen, as is now occurring in some countries with the downturn in lung cancer mortality following smoking reduction in men.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01625422
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer: a cohort study (2000)
    Springer
    Cancer causes & control 11 (2000), S. 239-247 
    Details
    ISSN: 1573-7225
    Keywords: alcohol ; breast cancer
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objectives: To study the association between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk. Methods: A case–cohort analysis was undertaken within the cohort of 56,837 women who were enrolled in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) and who completed a self-administered dietary questionnaire. (The NBSS is a randomized controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women aged 40–59 at recruitment.) The cohort was recruited between 1980 and 1985, and during follow-up to the end of 1993 a total of 1469 women in the dietary cohort were diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed incident breast cancer. For comparative purposes a subcohort consisting of a random sample of 5681 women was selected from the full dietary cohort. After exclusions for various reasons the analyses were based on 1336 cases and 5238 noncases. Results: When compared to nondrinkers the adjusted incidence rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) for those consuming 〉 0 and  ≤ 10 g of alcohol/day,  〉 10 and  ≤ 20 g/day,  〉 20 and  ≤thinsp;30 g/day,  〉 30 and  ≤ 40 g/day,  〉 40 and  ≤ 50 g/day, and  〉 50 g/day were 1.01 (0.84–1.22), 1.16 (0.91–1.47), 1.27 (0.91–1.78), 0.77 (0.51–1.16), 1.00 (0.57–1.75), and 1.70 (0.97–2.98), respectively; the associated p value for the test for trend was 0.351. Similar findings were obtained when analyses were conducted separately in the screened and control arms of the NBSS, in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, for screen-detected and interval-detected breast cancer, and by levels of other breast cancer risk factors. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that alcohol consumption might be associated with increased risk of breast cancer at relatively high levels of intake.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008933824645
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...