Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of molecular medicine 64 (1986), S. 701-707 
    ISSN: 1432-1440
    Keywords: Carcinoembryonic antigen ; CEA ; Breast cancer
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary The diagnostic validity of serial CEA determinations in metastatic breast cancer was investigated. First, the CEA values within 8 weeks after start of therapy were correlated with the response to therapy. Second, the CEA levels were used to predict progression after remission or stable disease. These investigations were performed in 150 patients with advanced breast cancer who had clinical follow-ups and serial CEA determinations every one to three months. CEA was not useful for monitoring response to therapy (sensitivity 63%, specifity 58%) or prediction of relapse (sensitivity 61%, specifity 82%) if CEA levels were correlated with clinical course in all patients. However, diagnostic validity of CEA was achieved if the patients were selected and appropriate definitions of significant changes in CEA used. Thus, 83% of the responders (sensitivity) could be identified by a significant decrease of CEA titers in patients with CEA levels of ≧10 ng/ml. A decrease of more than 10% of pretreatment levels during the first 4–8 weeks after start of therapy proved to be the appropriate definition of a significant decrease of CEA titers. However, 32% of the non-responders were misclassified as responders (unspecifity) using these criteria. The positive predictive value of a significant decrease of CEA for response to therapy was 72% (prevalence 45%), the negative predictive value 82% (prevalence 55%). Rising CEA titers specifically predicted progression of disease in patients with remission or stable disease. However, an appropriate sensitivity (86%) was achieved only in patients with baseline CEA levels of ≧5 ng/ml. The selection criteria described applied to one-third of the patients in the present study. Prospective studies based on these results have to show whether the definitions used can be generalized and are to be recommended for clinical practice.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-0584
    Keywords: Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ; Neutropenia ; Thrombocytopenia ; Testicular cancer
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Despite the increasing use of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, few studies have focused on the activity and toxicity of the different clinically used dosages of GM-CSF. Forty-four patients with “poor-risk” (advanced disease, according to the Indiana University classification) testicular cancer were treated with a dose-intensified chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin (30 mg/m2), etoposide (200 mg/m2), and ifosfamide (1.6 g/m2), given on days 1–5 for a total of four cycles at planned intervals of 21 days. Patients (pts) received GM-CSF, either 10 (22 pts; 70 cycles evaluable) or 5 μg/kg body wt. daily s.c. (22 pts; 72 cycles evaluable), starting the first day after chemotherapy for 10 consecutive days. Overall, 34 patients (78%) achieved a favorable response (CR or PR with negative tumor markers), six patients (14%) failed this chemotherapy regimen, and four patients (9%) died of therapy-related complications. The durations of both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia increased with the number of treatment cycles given. The duration of granulocytopenia after the fourth PEI cycle was significantly shorter for patients receiving 10 μg/kg than for those with 5 μg/kg per day of GM-CSF (9 vs 13 days;p〈0.05). The median duration of thrombocytopenia 〈20000/μl after the fourth cycle of PEI was also significantly reduced in favor of patients receiving 10 μg/kg of GM-CSF (4 vs 9 days;p〈 0.02). However, there were no differences in the frequency of severe infections or in the achieved dose intensity. Five patients (11%) discontinued GM-CSF due to side effects (three anaphylactoid-type reactions, one myalgia and fever, one cutaneous toxicity). No difference in the frequency of side effects was seen between patients receiving 5 and those receiving 10 μg/kg per day of GM-CSF. The dose of 5 μg/kg per day of GM-CSF may be sufficient to ameliorate neutropenia following standard-dose chemotherapy, while higher dosages of GM-CSF may be advantageous in patients receiving repetitive cycles of dose-intensified chemotherapy.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...