Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Pharmacokinetics ; Population ; NONMEM ; NPML ; Docetaxel ; Taxotere
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Docetaxel, a novel anticancer agent, was given to 26 patients by short i.v. infusion (1–2 h) at various dose levels (70–115 mg/m2, the maximum tolerated dose) during 2 phase I studies. Two population analyses, one using NONMEM (nonlinear mixed-effect modeling) and the other using NPML (nonparametric maximum-likelihood), were performed sequentially to determine the structural model; estimate the mean population parameters, including clearance (Cl) and interindividual variability; and find influences of demographic covariates on them. Nine covariates were included in the analyses: age, height, weight, body surface area, sex, performance status, presence of liver metastasis, dose level, and type of formulation. A three-compartment model gave the best fit to the data, and the final NONMEM regression model for Cl wasCl=BSA(θ1+θ2×AGE), expressing Cl (in liters per hour) directly as a function of body surface area. Only these two covariates were considered in the NPML analysis to confirm the results found by NONMEM. Using NONMEM [for a patient with mean AGE (52.3 years) and mean BSA (1.68 m2)] and NPML, docetaxel Cl was estimated to be 35.6 l/h (21.2 lh−1 m−2) and 37.2 l/h with interpatient coefficients of variation (CVs) of 17.4% and 24.8%, respectively. The intraindividual CV was estimated at 23.8% by NONMEM; the corresponding variability was fixed in NPML in an additive Gaussian variance error model with a 20% CV. Discrepancies were found in the mean volume at steady state (Vss; 83.2 l for NPML versus 124 l for NONMEM) and in terminal half-lives, notably the meant 1/2γ, which was shorter as determined by NPML (7.89 versus 12.2 h), although the interindividual CV was 89.1% and 62.7% for Vss andt 1/2γ, respectively. However, the NPML-estimated probability density function (pdf) oft 1/2γ, was bimodal (5 and 11.4 h), probably due to the imbalance of the data. Both analyses suggest a similar magnitude of mean Cl decrease with small BSA and advanced age.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Key words Pharmacokinetics ; Population ; NONMEM ; NPML ; Docetaxel ; Taxotere
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  Docetaxel, a novel anticancer agent, was given to 26 patients by short i.v. infusion (1–2 h) at various dose levels (70–115 mg/m2, the maximum tolerated dose) during 2 phase I studies. Two population analyses, one using NONMEM (nonlinear mixed-effect modeling) and the other using NPML (nonparametric maximum-likelihood), were performed sequentially to determine the structural model; estimate the mean population parameters, including clearance (Cl) and interindividual variability; and find influences of demographic covariates on them. Nine covariates were included in the analyses: age, height, weight, body surface area, sex, performance status, presence of liver metastasis, dose level, and type of formulation. A three-compartment model gave the best fit to the data, and the final NONMEM regression model for Cl was Cl=BSA(θ1+θ2×AGE), expressing Cl (in liters per hour) directly as a function of body surface area. Only these two covariates were considered in the NPML analysis to confirm the results found by NONMEM. Using NONMEM [for a patient with mean AGE (52.3 years) and mean BSA (1.68 m2)] and NPML, docetaxel Cl was estimated to be 35.6 l/h (21.2 l h-1 m-2) and 37.2 l/h with interpatient coefficients of variation (CVs) of 17.4% and 24.8%, respectively. The intraindividual CV was estimated at 23.8% by NONMEM; the corresponding variability was fixed in NPML in an additive Gaussian variance error model with a 20% CV. Discrepancies were found in the mean volume at steady state (Vss; 83.2 l for NPML versus 124 l for NONMEM) and in terminal half-lives, notably the mean t 1/2γ, which was shorter as determined by NPML (7.89 versus 12.2 h), although the interindividual CV was 89.1% and 62.7% for Vss and t 1/2γ, respectively. However, the NPML-estimated probability density function (pdf) of t 1/2γ was bimodal (5 and 11.4 h), probably due to the imbalance of the data. Both analyses suggest a similar magnitude of mean Cl decrease with small BSA and advanced age.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-1335
    Keywords: Granisetron ; Metoclopramide ; Dexamethasone ; Fractionated chemotherapy ; Emesis
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The antiemetic efficacy and safety of granisetron (40 μg/kg), a selective and potent 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) antagonist, was compared with that of metoclopramide (7 mg/kg) plus dexamethasone (12 mg) in patients receiving fractionated chemotherapy. Patients receiving cisplatin at doses of at least 15 mg/m2 or etoposide at least 120 mg/m2 or ifosfamide at least 1.2 g/m2 on each of 5 consecutive days were eligible. A total of 143 patients received granisetron and 141 received the comparator regimen. The 5-day complete response rate (no vomiting, no worse than mild nausea) for granisetron (46.8%) was equivalent to that for metoclopramide plus dexamethasone (43.9%). The overall 5-day response profile was superior for granisetron (P=0.013) because of fewer failures in this group. The overall incidence of adverse experiences was significantly lower in the granisetron group (60.8% versus 77.3%,P=0.003). Headache and constipation, more prevalent in the granisetron group, are recognized side-effects of serotonin antagonists. Extrapyramidal syndrome, not seen in any granisetron patients, occurred in 20.6% of comparator patients (P〈0.0001). The majority of granisetron patients only required a single prophylactic dose of the drug on each treatment day (at least 82%). In conclusion, granisetron showed at least equivalent efficacy to metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving 5-day fractionated chemotherapy. In addition it offered a simple and convenient dosing regimen and a safer side-effect profile.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...