Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Cortical DC shift ; Movement-related brain potentials ; Bereitschaftspotential ; Bimanual coordination ; Supplementary motor area
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Cortical DC shifts preceding and accompanying the execution of five different bimanual motor tasks were analysed in 20 subjects. All tasks required repetitive flexions and extensions of the two forefingers for a period of at least six seconds. The temporal and spatial structures organization varied in the different tasks: (1) Simultaneous agonistic performance (forefinger flexion on both sides), (2) simultaneous antagonistic performance (e.g. flexion of the right, extension of the left forefinger), (3) sequential agonistic performance, (4) sequential antagonistic performance, (5) uncoordinated flexions and extensions of the two forefingers. Compared to (1) and (2), conditions (3) and (4) included a temporal delay between the performance of the two forefingers; compared to (1) and (3), conditions (2) and (4) required the subjects to perform movements of opposite directions with their two forefingers. Effects of the temporal factor (T; simultaneous vs. sequential) and the spatial factor (S; agonistic vs. antagonistic) on cortical DC shifts were investigated. The voluntary initiation of each motor task was preceded by a Bereitschaftspotential (BP). The performance of the complex tasks (1–4) was accompanied by a slow negative DC potential shift (N-P). In general, the BP did not differ depending on the temporal or spatial structures of the tasks (1–4). However, amplitudes of N-P (i.e. during tasks) were influenced by the temporal factor with significantly larger amplitudes in sequential than in simultaneous tasks. This difference was not a global phenomenon in all recordings but was selectively found in the recordings over the fronto-central midline. The spatial factor had no influence on N-P. It is suggested that the timing-dependent increase of N-P reflects greater activation of the fronto-central midline including the supplementary motor area (SMA) in sequential as compared to simultaneous movements. Furthermore, the data substantiate the hypothesis that the fronto-central midline (including the SMA) is rather involved in the temporal than the spatial coordination of bimanual motor tasks.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 74 (1989), S. 99-104 
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Movement-related brain potentials ; Bereitschaftspotential ; Primary motor cortex ; Supplementary motor area ; DC-recordings
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Negative cortical DC shifts preceding and accompanying the execution of four different motor tasks were analysed in 18 subjects (Ss): Repetitive flexions and extensions of the forefinger had to be performed either by the right (1) or the left (2) hand. This simple motor task was compared to a complex one in which flexions and extensions of forefinger and hand had to be alternated in a fixed sequence. The complex task had either to be performed by the right (3) or the left (4) hand. Thus, the four conditions differed in the side of the performing hand (right/left) and in task-complexity (simple/complex). After its voluntary initiation, each task had to be performed for at least a period of six seconds. A Bereitschaftspotential (BP) preceded the voluntary initiation of the movement. Task-performance was accompanied by a negative DC shift called a performance-related negativity (N-P). Amplitudes of BP and N-P were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the factors “performing hand” (right/left) and “task-complexity” (simple/complex). “Performing hand” had significant effects on N-BP and N-P in C3* and C4* (positioned over the primary motor cortex) but did not influence mid-central (Cz*), frontal (F3, Fz, and F4) or parietal (P3, Pz, P4) recordings. “Task-complexity” had significant effects on N-P in mid-central (Cz*, C1*, C2*) and parietal (P3, Pz) recordings with higher negativity for complex movements. Recordings in C3* and C4* did not vary with “task complexity”. Dissociative effects of “performing hand” and “task-complexity” indicate that movement-related DC-potential shifts in C3*/ C4* can functionally be separated from those recorded in Cz*. Variations depending on the specific properties of the tasks were found to be larger during performance than during preparation of the task.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...