Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1433-0385
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter: Schultereckgelenkverletzung ; Therapie ; „evidence-based-medicine“. ; Keywords: Acromioclavicular dislocation ; Treatment ; Evidence-based medicine.
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract. There is controversy about the therapy for third-degree acromioclavicular dislocation according to Tossy and Rockwood's classification. Both operative and non-operative treatment is reported to have satisfactory results in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze the literature in a systematic manner based on the criteria of evidence-based medicine. It was our hypothesis that there is no scientific evidence for the superiority of one treatment over the other. A total of 370 papers were retrieved and classified into three groups: (1) randomized controlled trials; (2) comparative retrospective studies; and (3) retrospective studies. In three studies that were graded with high evidence, the major outcome for both operative and non-operative treatment was similar. The advantages of non-operative treatment include a shorter period of rehabilitation and a significantly lower complication rate while the advantages of operative treatment include a low rate of persisting subluxation of the AC joint. Similar results were found for retrospective comparative and long-term studies. For retrospective studies without controls, both operative and conservative therapy are described with good and excellent results, ranging between 80 and 97 %. In conclusion, there is good evidence on the therapy of third-degree acromioclaviculary dislocation studies. The functional result according to the literature is similar, and complications associated with therapy occur more often with operative treatment. Conservative treatment appears to be the method of choice for third-degree acromioclavicular dislocations unless the patient's preference is operative therapy.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung. Die Therapie der Schultereckgelenkverletzung, insbesondere die Typ-III-Verletzung nach Tossy et al. und Rockwood wird weiter kontrovers diskutiert. In der Literatur werden verschiedene operative Behandlungsmethoden, aber auch eine rein konservative Therapie mit guten Ergebnissen beschrieben. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, in einer systematischen Literaturanalyse zu untersuchen, ob nach Kriterien der „evidence based medicine“ Vorteile eines operativen oder konservativen Behandlungsregimes der Tossy-III-Verletzung vorliegen. 370 Studien zur Acromioclaviculargelenkverletzung wurden untersucht und soweit zur Fragestellung geeignet, randomisierten Vergleichsstudien (1), retrospektiven Vergleichsstudien (2) und retrospektiven Studien ohne Vergleichskollektiv (3) zugeordnet. In der Gruppe mit hoher klinischer Evidenz (1) konnten 3 Studien gefunden werden. In diesen werden vergleichbare funktionelle Ergebnisse nach operativer beziehungsweise konservativer Therapie beschrieben, wobei für konservativ behandelte Patienten eine kürzere Rehabilitation und deutlich weniger Therapiekomplikationen bei einer jedoch verbleibenden Subluxationsstellung angegeben werden. Auch für die Gruppe der retrospektiven Studien mit Vergleichskollektiv sind unter Berücksichtigung der zum Teil erheblichen methodischen Einschränkungen ähnliche Ergebnisse der beiden Therapiemöglichkeiten auch in Langzeituntersuchungen angegeben. Für Untersuchungen ohne Vergleichskollektiv sind sowohl für verschiedene operative Stabilisierungsverfahren als auch nach rein funktionell-konservativer Therapie gute und sehr gute Ergebnisse mit hohem Anteil beschrieben. Als Ergebnis muß festgehalten werden, daß zur Frage einer operativen oder konservativen Therapie der drittgradigen Schultereckgelenkverletzung Studien mit hoher und ausreichender Evidenz vorliegen. Das funktionelle Ergebnis ist nach Studienlage vergleichbar, die Rate an therapieassoziierten Komplikationen nach operativer Stabilisierung ist jedoch höher. Aufgrund dieser Ergebnisse kann nach Kriterien einer evidenzbasierten Medizin zur Therapie der Tossy-III-Verletzung in erster Linie die konservative Therapie empfohlen werden. Die Indikation zu einer operativen Therapie sollte streng gestellt werden.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Der Anaesthesist 43 (1994), S. 786-790 
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter: Trauma – Kardiopulmonale Reanimation – Notarztsysteme ; Key words: Trauma – Cardiopulmonary resuscitation – Emergency medical systems
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract. Posttraumatic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with a poor outcome. When evaluating the literature according to the Utstein method, there were only 2 survivors (0.18%) out of 1,135 CPR attempts after trauma (Table 1). Differences in the study populations and levels of prehospital trauma care led us to analyse the results of a physician-staffed prehospital trauma care system in Cologne. Methods. From January 1987 to December 1990, a total of 49,054 emergency calls were registered using a standardised protocol. Among 9,595 trauma-related calls, 636 patients were found to be pulseless on arrival of the emergency team, 412 of these were pronounced dead. CPR was initiated in the remaining 224 patients, who comprise the study population (defined as 100%). All patients who were admitted to a hospital were followed using a second protocol. Results. CPR in the field was successful in 68 (30.4%) patients, who were then admitted to a hospital; 42 of these died within the first 24 h. Four patients (1.8%) could be discharged from hospital alive and were still living 1 year later, 1 with a lasting neurological deficit (Fig. 1). In 156 (69.6%) cases resuscitative attempts were unsuccessful in the field. Conclusions. Even in a physician-staffed prehospital trauma care system, the chance of surviving a post-traumatic cardiac arrest is minimal. Survival has to be regarded as an individual fate; the overall results are discouraging. Even though this study analyses the largest population of posttraumatic CPR ever published, prognostic factors could not be identified due to the few survivors. Nevertheless, the result does not justify general omission of CPR after trauma as: (1) prognostic factors for survival have not been identified thus far; and (2) no significant additional costs arise from posttraumatic CPR.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung. Für die präklinische kardiopulmonale Reanimation nach Trauma werden in der Literatur Überlebensraten zwischen 0% und 1,7% beschrieben. Die vorliegende Arbeit analysiert die Ergebnisse der Reanimation Schwerverletzter am Beispiel einer Millionenstadt mit einem organisierten Notarztdienst. Vom 01. 01. 1987 bis zum 31. 12. 1990 wurden vom Kölner Rettungsdienst 9595 Verletzte präklinisch behandelt. Von diesen waren 636 bei Ankunft des Notarztes pulslos, in 224 Fällen (definiert als 100%) wurde eine kardiopulmonale Reanimation begonnen. 68 (30,4%) Patienten konnten in ein Krankenhaus eingeliefert werden, vier (1,8%) wurden lebend entlassen. Ein Schwerverletzter mit Herz-Kreislaufstillstand hat eine nur minimale Überlebenschance. Auch bei maximaler präklinischer Therapie unter Einsatz eines Notarztes ist die Überlebensquote enttäuschend. Trotzdem darf nicht grundsätzlich auf eine Reanimation Schwerverletzter verzichtet werden, weil keine Prognosefaktoren zur Identifizierung potentiell Überlebender existieren und weil keine zusätzlichen signifikanten Kosten entstehen.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Langenbeck's archives of surgery 383 (1998), S. 228-234 
    ISSN: 1435-2451
    Keywords: Key words Outcome ; Polytrauma ; Outcome research ; Quality of life
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background and aims: Outcome refers to the different facets of consequences resulting from an event or intervention. These consequences may be relevant for an individual patient, but also for society. There is a growing recognition that clinical research needs to define and focus on the outcomes of medical care. Outcome research should help health care professionals to better evaluate the effectiveness of specific interventions or a therapeutic concept. This broader base of evidence should then benefit the patients. Methods: The literature was reviewed with respect to concepts of outcome research as well as results of outcome research after major trauma. Results: Measuring outcome might be relevant for research purposes as well as in daily surgical practice. In the past, clinical research in trauma care has tended to focus on survival. Mortality rates are not out, complication rates are not out, but their value is limited and restricted to given scenarios with high mortality rates. New outcomes have to be added: such a functional status, emotional health, social interaction, cognitive function, degree of disability and other indicators of health. Conclusion: Despite differences in injury pattern and severity of injury, there is strong evidence from the literature that the quality of life is significantly impaired after major trauma. This is true for functional outcome as well as for psycho-social outcome in up to 70% of patients.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...