Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 795 (1996), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1749-6632
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Natural Sciences in General
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1365-2516
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: An open-label multicentre trial was conducted to evaluate high-dose DDAVP (desmopressin acetate) intranasal spray (Stimate®; 1.5 mg mL–1), for the control of bleeding in 333 patients with mild haemophilia A, mild or moderate type 1 von Willebrand disease, or symptomatic carriers of haemophilia A. Overall, 278 patients received 2170 doses of high-dose DDAVP intranasal spray (1.5 mg mL–1). Using study-defined guidelines, patients evaluated the efficacy of high-dose DDAVP intranasal spray (1.5 mg mL–1) as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ in 743 (95%) of 784 bleeding episodes. It demonstrated ‘excellent’ results in 384 (93%) of 413 administrations for prophylaxis and in eight of eight uses prior to acute surgical or dental procedures. When used for the treatment of menorrhagia, the efficacy of high-dose DDAVP intranasal spray (1.5 mg mL–1) was rated as ‘excellent’ after 655 (92%) of 721 daily uses. Of 2170 doses of high-dose DDAVP intranasal spray (1.5 mg mL–1), 172 (8%) were associated with adverse events. A total of 272 adverse events were reported among 80 patients. Of these, 239 (88%) were mild or moderate in intensity and only one patient was removed from the study due to an adverse event. These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of high-dose DDAVP intranasal spray (1.5 mg mL–1) for control of bleeding episodes in patients with mildly decreased levels of factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, or both.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Amsterdam : Elsevier
    Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 21 (1986), S. 267-269 
    ISSN: 0165-4608
    Source: Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002
    Topics: Medicine
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1439-0973
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Ceftazidim hat sich in Monotherapie bei ausgewählten Patienten in der empirischen Behandlung von febriler Neutropenie als wirksam erwiesen, dennoch muß die Effizienz einer Antibiotika-Monotherapie bei neutropenischen Patienten mit Fieber nach wie vor als unbewiesen angesehen werden. Bei neutropenischen Kindern im Alter von 8 Monaten bis 18 Jahren, die eine Krebs-Chemotherapie durchmachten, wurde wegen Fieber eine Behandlung mit Ceftazidim allein oder in Kombination mit Tobramycin durchgeführt. Die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit dieser beiden Therapieformen wurde verglichen. Von den 89 auswertbaren Patienten erhielten 45 Ceftazidim allein und 44 in Kombination mit Tobramycin. Die Behandlungsdauer lag zwischen 5 und 10 Tagen. Am Ende der Behandlung waren 30 der 45 mit Ceftazidim allein behandelten Patienten (67%) geheilt, in der mit Ceftazidim plus Tobramycin behandelten Gruppe 38 von 44 (86%). 13 der mit Ceftazidim behandelten Patienten (29%) sprachen klinisch nicht auf die Therapie an, in der Ceftazidim/Tobramycin-Gruppe waren 4 Therapieversager (9%) festzustellen (p=0,046). Aus dieser Studie läßt sich ableiten, daß Ceftazidim bei Kindern mit Neutropenie und Fieber in Monotherapie nicht in gleichem Ausmaß optimale Therapieergebnisse erzielen kann wie die Kombination Ceftazidim plus Tobramycin.
    Notes: Summary Although the effectiveness of antibiotic monotherapy in febrile neutropenic patients remains unproven, ceftazidime has been shown previously to be effective monotherapy for the empiric treatment of selective patients. The efficacy and safety of ceftazidime versus ceftazidime plus tobramycin was evaluated in the treatment of febrile children (range 8 months to 18 years) with neutropenia secondary to cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Of the evaluable 89 patients, 45 received ceftazidime and 44 received ceftazidime plus tobramycin for 5 to 10 days. At the end of therapy, 30 (67%) of the 45 ceftazidime-treated patients were clinically cured compared with 38 (86%) of 44 combination-treated patients. Thirteen (29%) of the patients treated with ceftazidime failed to respond clinically to treatment, versus four (9%) of the patients treated with ceftazidime/tobramycin (p=0.046). This study suggests that ceftazidime as monotherapy in febrile neutropenic children may be inferior to combination therapy for optimal clinical response in these patients.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...