Library

Notes: Background The Th2 immune response in the nasal mucosa of subjects with allergic rhinitis is mediated by allergen-specific IgE. Moreover, these subjects show positive responses for markers of systemic atopy, including allergen-specific skin sensitivity and raised serum IgE titres. In contrast, idiopathic rhinitis (IR) subjects with similar histological nasal mucosal features differ in being defined as non-allergic because they have negative atopic responses.Objective We hypothesized that it is possible to have an allergic Th2 disease pathway localized in the nasal mucosa of ‘non-allergic’ rhinitis subjects despite an absence of atopic responses.Methods The presence of house dust mite and grass pollen-specific IgE antibodies was investigated in non-atopic (n=10) and atopic (n=11) subjects with persistent rhinitis and compared to normal (n=12) control subjects. Biotin-labelled allergen was used to localize specific allergen-binding antibodies in situ in sections of nasal mucosa.Results Grass pollen allergen binding was detected in the nasal mucosa of 3/10 non-atopic IR subjects but, in contrast, dust mite-specific antibodies were not detected. Specific antibodies were present in a total of 8/11 mucosal samples from the allergic group, but none was detected in normal control tissues.Conclusion These findings support the concept of localized nasal allergy in ‘non-atopic’ rhinitis subjects. We propose the term ‘entopy’ to define this phenomenon and believe that this concept has a wider implication for localized allergic responses in other mucosal sites.

Notes: Background The pathophysiology of idiopathic rhinitis is unknown but the disease is classified as being non-allergic on the basis of negative serum IgE radioallergosorbent assay (RAST) and skin prick tests. In contrast, allergic rhinitis has a Th2 type inflammatory pathology mediated by IgE and mast cells.Objective To test the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in the cellular infiltrate for key Th2-associated inflammatory cells between allergic and idiopathic rhinitis.Methods We applied strict selection criteria in the recruitment of allergic and idiopathic rhinitis cases. In contrast to previous studies which used cytology or small biopsies, we studied all layers of the mucosa by using whole, full-thickness nasal turbinate specimens with an average length of 2.5 cm. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization techniques were used to compare the distribution and cell populations of mast cells, IgE positive (IgE+) cells, eosinophils and plasma cells in perennial allergic (n = 11) and idiopathic (n = 17) rhinitis, and control nasal mucosal tissue (n = 9).Results Mast cells and IgE+ cells were significantly increased within the epithelium of allergic and idiopathic mucosa compared to normal mucosa (P 〈 0.05). More IgE+ cells were present in the allergic group compared to the idiopathic group with the majority of IgE+ cells being mast cells. Both rhinitic groups showed increased eosinophilia localized to the superficial submucosa compared to normal mucosa (P 〈 0.05). More plasma cells were present in the allergic rhinitic tissue.Conclusion Idiopathic and allergic rhinitic mucosa show similarities in their inflammatory infiltrate suggesting that both groups share a highly localized Th2, IgE-mediated cellular immunopathology.

Notes: Background The pathophysiology of idiopathic rhinitis is unknown although evidence is accumulating to suggest that many patients may have a localized form of allergic rhinitis in the absence of other atopic symptoms and markers. This study compares detailed nasal challenge results obtained from patients with idiopathic rhinitis to those of atopic and normal controls.Methods Patients with idiopathic rhinitis (n = 23), perennial allergic rhinitis (n = 8) and normal controls (n = 8) underwent a normal saline challenge to exclude hyper-reactivity and then bilateral nasal allergen challenges. Nasal patency was assessed by anterior active rhinomanometry.Results All of the patients with atopic rhinitis demonstrated positive bilateral allergen challenges. All normal control subjects had bilateral negative challenges. Two patients in the idiopathic group tested positively to saline and were excluded from further study with 62% of the remainder testing positive to allergens. Of the idiopathic patients testing positive, 85% were sensitive to house dust mite.Conclusion A significant proportion of patients with idiopathic rhinitis have positive nasal challenges, the vast majority to house dust mite allergen. These findings add to the weight of evidence that suggests ‘localized allergy’ may exist in the absence of systemic atopic markers.

Notes: Background:  Allergic rhinitis is characterized by selective expansion of T cell subsets with a CD4+ phenotype. Recently, we identified a subpopulation of nonallergic rhinitis subjects with increased epithelial mast cell and eosinophil populations, suggestive of local mucosal allergy. Previously, T cell subsets have not been characterized in this subselection of nonallergic subjects and furthermore, their relationship to mast cell and basophil effector cells remain unidentified.Objective:  To determine if a subpopulation of nonallergic subjects with idiopathic rhinitis (IR) have localized allergy confined to their nasal mucosa by comparing the T cell subsets and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II expressing cells to persistent allergic rhinitis (PAR). Furthermore, the relationship between T cell subsets and mast cells/basophils was investigated.Methods:  None of the symptomatic patients in this study were clinically allergen-challenged. Nasal turbinate mucosa was removed from patients with PAR, IR and normal controls. Morphometry was performed on immunostained sections for T cell subset populations including CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD25+, CD45RA+, CD45RO+, human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-DRα (MHC class II), mast cell tryptase and for basophils.Results:  Subjects with persistent allergic rhinitis differed to normal controls in showing significantly increased numbers of total (CD3+), activated (CD25+) and allergen-naïve (CD45RA+) T lymphocytes in their nasal mucosa (P 〈 0.025). The naïve CD45RA+ memory T cells correlated to mucosal mast cells in PAR (P = 0.03). IR patients differ to allergic subjects in showing significantly reduced numbers of epithelial HLA-DRα+ cells (P = 0.007), but increased numbers of CD8+ lymphocytes (P = 0.02). The CD8+ T cells correlated with mucosal mast cell numbers (P = 0.02). In both rhinitis groups, basophils were present in very low numbers obviating the need for statistical analysis.Conclusion:  PAR is characterized by increased numbers of CD3+, CD25+ and CD45RA+ T lymphocytes compared with normal mucosa. Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis groups can be separated by significant differences in the number of epithelial antigen presenting cells (APCs) (HLA-DRα+) and sub-epithelial activated (CD25+) T cells. Moreover, IR patients do not significantly differ to their allergic counterparts with respect to total (CD3+) and naïve (CD45RA+) T cell numbers, or numbers of epithelial activated (CD25+) lymphocytes. IR subjects show significantly increased numbers of CD8+ lymphocytes compared with control mucosa and although our findings suggest that the initiating inflammatory events may differ, both rhinitis groups show a similarity in pathology involving mucosal mast cells with an association to infiltrating T cells.