Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Der Anaesthesist 43 (1994), S. 115-120 
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter: Intrinsischer PEEP – Externer PEEP – Beatmung ; Key words: Intrinsic PEEP – External PEEP – Mechanical ventilation
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract. Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) occurring during mechanical ventilation depends on expiratory time constants, expiratory volume and expiration time as well as on external flow resistance (tubes, valves, etc.). It is not routinely determined in mechanically ventilated patients, but it is necessary to optimize respirator settings. The aim of the present study was the validation of an automated PEEPi determination method implemented in the respirator EVITA (Drägerwerke, Lübeck) in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung failure. Patients. The method was validated in ten sedated, myorelaxed patients with respiratory insufficiency of different etiologies (five with restrictive, and five with obstructive pulmonary disease). PEEPi was determined using the volume constant ventilatory mode at ZEEP or at an external PEEP of 5 as well as 10 cm H2O. Method. PEEPi was first determined with the automated method implemented in the EVITA (five measurements at each end-expiratory pressure level; PEEPEvita). Steady-state was attained between each measurement. These values were compared to the results obtained with end-expiratory occlusion (external, computer-controlled valve in the inspiratory limb of the circuit) at the respective pressure levels (PEEPEEO). The average of five measurements at each PEEP level with each method was defined as PEEPi for the particular ventilatory situation. Gas flow was measured at the proximal end of the endotracheal tube with a heated pneumotachometer (Fleisch no. 2, Fleisch, Lausanne, Switzerland) and a differential pressure transducer. Tracheal pressure was determined in the same position with a further differential pressure transducer (Dr. Fenyves & Gut, Basel, Switzerland). After A/D conversion, data were sampled with a frequency of 20 Hz and processed on an IBM compatible PC. Software for data collection and processing as well as for control of the occlusion valve was self-programmed. For the statistical analysis we used the Mann-Whitney U-test or Wilcoxon signed-ranks test; a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results. At the given respiratory setting and without PEEP patients with obstructive lung disease had a higher PEEPi (median: 6.4 cm H2O; range: 5.0 – 9.6 cm H2O) than those with restrictive pulmonary disease (median: 2.3 cm H2O; range: 0.8 – 3.0 cm H2O) (P〈0.05). Increasing external PEEP to 5 or 10 cm H2O significantly decreased the pressure difference between PEEPi and external PEEP (P〈0.05), but was unable to eliminate it completely. There was no statistically significant difference between PEEPEEO and PEEPEvita (P=0.43; Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests). Regression analysis showed a highly significant correlation between PEEPEEO and PEEPEvita values (r=0.985, P〈0.001; y=1.03x−0.18). Discussion. PEEPi occurs during ventilation in patients with obstructive and restrictive lung disease. The difference between external end-expiratory pressure and PEEPi decreases with increasing external PEEP. However, PEEPi may increase with increasing external PEEP in some instances. The reason for this may be that the PEEPi determined at the proximal end of the endotracheal tube represents only a mean value of different PEEPi values of various lung regions. Increasing external PEEP only partially alters this mean value due to an effect on PEEPi values lower than external PEEP. The PEEPi values measured by the EVITA respirator compared with classical end-expiratory occlusion with an external valve were nearly identical. Unfortunately, PEEPi measurement of the EVITA can only be performed during controlled and not during assisting (PSV, BIPAP etc.) ventilation. Optimal respirator settings require a knowledge of PEEPi (i.e., adaption of external PEEP for lowering the work of breathing in COPD patients or prolongation of the expiratory phase to avoid unwanted side effects of an occult PEEPi on the circulation). Since modern microprocessor-controlled respirators can easily be updated with the necessary equipment, measurement of PEEPi should be a part of routine ventilatory monitoring today.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung. Der intrinsische PEEP (PEEPi) wurde mit einer neuen automatisierten Meßmethode des Beatmungsgeräts EVITA (EVITA mit Software 13, Drägerwerke, Lübeck) bei 10 Patienten (5 restriktive, 5 obstruktive Lungenerkrankungen) unter maschineller Beatmung bestimmt. Diese Meßmethode wurde validiert gegen eine computergesteuerte end-exspiratorische Okklusion mit externem Ventil. Der PEEPi wurde mit beiden Methoden unter dem klinisch eingestellten volumenkonstanten Beatmungsmodus bei ZEEP (Umgebungsdruck) sowie externem PEEP von 5 und 10 cm H2O gemessen. Der Gasfluß wurde pneumotachographisch (Fleisch No. 2), der Trachealdruck mit einem Differenzdruckaufnehmer gemessen. Die Daten wurden digital aufgenommen und über einen Personalcomputer weiterverarbeitet. Bei ZEEP betrug der PEEPi bei obstruktiver Lungenfunktionsstörung 6,4 (5,0 – 9,6) cm H2O gegenüber 2,3 (0,8 – 3,0) cm H2O bei Restriktion (Median und Bereich; p〈0,05). Ein externer PEEP von 5 bzw. 10 cm H2O verringerte mit steigendem externen PEEP jeweils die Druckdifferenz zwischen PEEPi und externem PEEP signifikant, konnte diese aber nicht völlig eliminieren. Der Vergleich zwischen dem PEEPi-Meßmanöver der EVITA und einer "klassischen" end-exspiratorischen Okklusion mit einem externen Ventil ergab eine recht genaue Übereinstimmung mit hochsignifikanter Korrelation (r=0,985; y=1,03x−0,18). Leider ist das in der EVITA inkorporierte PEEPi-Meßmanöver nur unter kontrollierter Beatmung, nicht aber bei assistierenden Beatmungsformen (PSV, BIPAP etc.) durchführbar. Da moderne Ventilatoren leicht mit dem notwendigen Equipment auszurüsten wären, sollte die Messung des PEEPi zum klinischen Routinemonitoring unter der Beatmung gehören.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Static compliance ; Pressure volume curve ; Pulmonary mechanics ; Acute respiratory failure ; Adult respiratory distress syndrome
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract A new method for determination the static compliance of the respiratory system is described (“static compliance by automated single steps”-SCASS). In 12 ventilated patients pressure/volume (P/V) curves were determined by automated repetitive occlusion (6 s) at single volume steps and compared to the conventional syringe method (SM). All measurements were corrected for effects of temperature, humidity and pressure (THP). SM was found to be significantly influenced by intrapulmonary gas exchange causing an effective mean volume deficit of 217.4±65.7 ml (BTPS) at the end of the deflation. In contrast to that, the short duration of occlusion in SCASS minimize the gas exchange effects. The methodical differences between both methods result in overestimation of the inflation compliance in the uncorrected SM (SMuncorr: 83.4±12.6; SCASS: 76.0±11.9 ml/cmH2O.p〈0.01) and underestimation of the deflation compliance resp. (SMuncorr: 58.3±7.5; SCASS: 79.1±15.0 ml/cmH2O.p〈0.005). In contrast to the P/V curves by SM no significant hysteresis was found by SCASS. Gas exchange seems to be the main reason for the hysteresis. Even after correcting gas exchange and THP effects a significant hyseresis remained. The SCASS method avoids these problems and allows furthermore an accurate checking of leaks.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Intrinsic PEEP ; External PEEP ; Static compliance ; Mechanical ventilation ; Alveolar recruitment
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective Evaluation of new computer-controlled occlusion procedure for determination of intrinsic PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients and comparison with the standard end-expiratory occlusion method. Design Prospective controlled study. Setting Intensive care unit of a university hospital Patients 16 patients with acute respiratory failure of different degree and etiology. All patients were mechanically ventilated, heavily sedated and muscle paralyzed (non-depolarising relaxants). The type of ventilator, the inspiration/expiration ratio, FIO2 and PEEP were selected by the attending clinicians according to the patients' need and independently from the study. Interventions Static compliance of the respiratory system (Cstat) was determined at varying external end-expiratory pressure settings: ZEEP (=ambient pressure), PEEP of 5 cmH2O and 10 cmH2O. All other ventilator settings were kept constant during the entire procedure. Measurements and results A computer-controlled occlusion method (SCASS) was used for determination of Cstat. Intrinsic PEEP was determined by SCASS as the extrapolated zero-volume intercept of the regression line of multiple pressure/volume data pairs (PEEPSCASSinspir and PEEPSCASSexpir). Directly thereafter intrinsic PEEP in this particular ventilatory setting was determined by end-expiratory occlusions (PEPPEEO). The intrinsic PEEP values of the different methods were nearly identical with a significant correlation (p〈0.0001). Mean values±SD: PEEPSCASSinspir 7.1±4.3 cmH2O; PEEPSCASSexpir 7.1±4.5 cmH2O; PEEPEEO 7.1±4.2 cmH2O. Conclusion Since no significant difference between PEEPi values measured by the inspiratory and expiratory occlusion method (SCASS) was seen, this indicates that no alveolar recruitment occurred during the respiratory cycle. This study demonstrates that the automated occlusion method for measuring Cstat system can also be used with high accuracy for determination of intrinsic PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...