Library

Notes: Background Allergen vaccination is effective in mite-allergic asthma. Liposomes are immunological adjuvants that can act as allergen carriers.Objective To evaluate the immunological and functional effects of a liposome-entrapped D. pteronyssinus vaccine on mite monosensitive, mild asthma patients.Methods A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 26 asthma patients who randomly received vaccination or placebo for 1 year. The levels of exposure to Der p 1 allergen were constant during the study. Allergen bronchial challenge was made at the beginning (T0) and after 1 year of treatment (T12). The day before and 24 h after the allergen provocation, patients were challenged with methacholine (Mth) (until FEV1 fell by 40%) and blood and sputum samples were obtained. Dose–response curves to Mth were evaluated in terms of Mth-PD20 (dose of Mth that induced 20% drop in FEV1), slope (Mth-DRS) and level of plateau. Blood and sputum eosinophils and serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) were measured.Results Groups were comparable at the start of the trial. At T12, previous to the allergen challenge, the active group showed higher values of both FEV1 and Mth-PD20 and lower values of Mth-DRS. The number of patients presenting a level of plateau increased in the active group (from two to four) and decreased in the placebo group (from two to one). At T12, before the allergen challenge, serum ECP levels increased in the placebo group and blood eosinophils showed a trend towards lower numbers in the active one. The immediate response and the changes in Mth-DRS values, sputum eosinophils and serum ECP levels following the allergen challenge were attenuated in the active group.Conclusion Liposome-entrapped D. Pteronyssinus vaccination: (i)  protects mild asthma patients from the worsening of asthma due to sustained mite exposure; and (ii) reduces the functional and inflammatory changes induced by allergen bronchial provocation.

Notes: Background: Asthma elicited by sulfite ingestion has been mainly described in steroid-dependent and in non-atopic asthmatics. We have studied a group of 18 young extrinsic asthmatics who presented with asthma attacks immediately after eating pickled onions.Objective: The aim of this study is to ascertain if these asthma attacks are elicited by sulfites contained in pickled onions and the influence of the dose and pH of onions.Methods: The bronchial hyperreactivity of the patients was assessed by a methacho-line challenge test. Oral challenge tests were performed with sodium metabisulfite (MBS) diluted in lemon juice at pH 4.2 and at pH 3.3 (only in patients who did not react with pH 4.2). Two types of pickled onion, Spanish and Dutch pickled onions, were used for oral challenge in seven of the patients. The Monier-Williams method was used to measure the SO2 concentration in pickled onions.Results: The oral provocation test with MBS, pH 4.2, elicited a positive response in six patients (33.3%) and the test at pH3.3 was positive in three out of 12. No significant difference in PD20 values was found between these groups. Three of the seven patients challenged with Spanish pickled onions had a positive reaction but had no reaction with Dutch pickled onions. The SC2 concentration in Spanish pickled onions varied between 765 and 1182 ppm while in Dutch pickled onions were 200 ppm; this exceeded the permitted level (100 ppm). SO2 release in Spanish pickled onion samples was nearly 2.5 times higher when the pH of the sample decreased from 4.2 to 3.3.Conclusion: High levels of SO2 in Spanish pickled onions, and their low pH (3.3) would be the responsible factors of the asthmatic outbreaks after ingestion of Spanish pickled onions by these patients.

Notes: Background Occupatiotial asthma among cereal workers is frequently due to cereals but other allergens can also be responsible.Objective We evaluated the allergens causing occupational asthma in the patients who had been diagnosed in our Department during the last 5 years. Specific bronchial reactivity to the implicated allergens was assessed and compared by standardized bronchial challenge.Methods Twenty-one patients (12 bakers, three millers and six farmers) were studied. We carried out in vivo tests (skin and challenge tests) and in vitro tests (specific IgE measurement) with cereals, enzymes, soyabean, storage mites and egg. A definitive diagnosis was established by means of specific bronchial provocation tests (BPT), except in three patients in whom it could not be carried out due to the severity of their asthma. In these cases the causative agent had to be determined by means of conjunctival challenge.Results Cereals were the main sensitizers among bakers (75%) and farmers (66%). Bakers were also sensitive to a-amylase (41%) and soyabean (25%), and farmers, to soyabean (33%) and storage mites (33%). Occupational asthma was due to cereals, soyabean and storage mites among millers.Conclusions Besides cereals, other allergens such as enzymes, leguminous, egg and storage mites can be the causative agents of occupational asthma among cereal workers. Sensitization to different allergens in the different jobs is very likely due to differences in exposure.

Notes: Background Several lipid-transfer proteins (LTPs) have been identified as important food allergens, especially in fruits of the Rosaceae family. The major peach (Prunus persica) allergen has been identified, sequenced and designated Pru p 3.Objective To present Pru p 3 as an aeroallergen able to induce occupational asthma.Methods A thorough investigation was performed in a fruit grower with occupational asthma. Skin prick–prick tests with peach leaves and prick tests with perennial respiratory allergens and pollens, fruits and peach leaf extracts were done. Serum-specific IgE was tested for peach leaf, peach fruit, peach skin and respiratory allergens that were positive in skin prick tests. Specific bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) with extracts of peach leaf were also done. Before and 24 h after the BPT, BPTs with methacholine and sputum induction were done. The IgE reactivity pattern to peach leaf and fruit extracts and to Pru p 3 was identified by using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Blotting inhibition of peach leaf extract by Pru p 3 was also performed. The putative allergen was quantified in leaf and fruit skin extracts with ELISA based on an anti-Pru p 3 antibody.Results Skin tests were positive for peach leaf and fruit. The BPT was positive, with immediate and delayed response. This test induced a decrease in PD20 (dose of agonist that induces a 20% fall in FEV1) methacholine and an increase in eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein in sputum. Peach leaf extract contained concentrations of Pru p 3 similar to those found in peach skin. Specific IgE immunodetection showed that patient's sera reacted with Pru p 3, and with a single major band from the peach leaf extract fully inhibited by Pru p 3.Conclusion Pru p 3 from peach leaves can act as a respiratory allergen and cause occupational rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma.

Notes: Background Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is an extensively grown and consumed vegetable. To a lesser extent than other Liliaceae vegetables, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) due to asparagus has been reported. However, only a few case reports of asparagus IgE-mediated allergy have been published. In a previous study, we demonstrated that two lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) (Aspa o 1.01 and Aspa o 1.02) were relevant allergens of asparagus.Objective We retrospectively analysed the 27 patients diagnosed with asparagus allergy during the last 5 years. All of them reported adverse symptoms after either asparagus ingestion or handling. We describe their clinical features and evaluate whether they were associated to immunological findings (immunoblot pattern and skin reactivity to LTPs).Methods Patients underwent skin prick and patch tests with standard panels of vegetables and aeroallergens. Besides crude asparagus extract, two purified LTPs were prick and patch tested. Total and specific IgE measurements and asparagus extract IgE immunoblotting were performed. Patients reporting asthma symptoms underwent specific inhalation challenge to asparagus.Results Of the 27 subjects, eight had ACD, 17 had IgE-mediated allergy and two had both ACD- and IgE-mediated allergy. Positive patch tests with the crude asparagus extract but not with LTPs were observed in subjects with ACD (n=10). Of 19 patients with IgE-mediated disease, 10 had contact urticaria after asparagus handling. Of them, five subjects and five others without skin allergy showed respiratory symptoms; of them, eight were diagnosed with occupational asthma confirmed by positive asparagus inhalation challenge, whereas the remaining two had isolated rhinitis. Four patients suffered from immediate allergic reactions related to asparagus ingestion (food allergy); three of them reported anaphylaxis whereas the other had oral allergic syndrome. Positive IgE immunoblotting (bands of 15 and 45–70 kDa) was observed in 10 subjects. Of 10 subjects with positive prick test to LTPs, six showed bands at 15 kDa. Either IgE-binding bands or positive prick tests to LTPs were observed in asthma (62%) and anaphylaxis (67%).Conclusion Asparagus is a relevant source of occupational allergy inducing ACD and also IgE-mediated reactions. Severe disease (anaphylaxis or asthma) is common and LTPs seem to play a major role. The clinical relevance of LTP sensitization among patients with mild disease or symptom-free subjects should be addressed in prospective studies.

Notes: A group of 34 penicillin-allergic patients was studied to determine skin test reactivity to the different penicillins involved in inducing the allergic reaction and the cross-reactivity with side-chain-related and side-chain-unrelated cephalosporins. All the subjects selected for the study had to be skin test positive to at least one of the following determinants: benzyl-penicilloyl-polylysine (BPO-PLL), minor-determinant mixture (MDM), amoxicillin (AX), or ampicillin (AMP), or to possess in vitro IgE to the following conjugates: benzyl-penicilloyl-human-serum albumin (BPO-HSA), ampicilloyl-human-serum albumin (AMP-HSA), and amoxicilloyl-human-serum albumin (AX-HSA). Cephalexin (CE) and ceftazidime (CEF) were used to assess cross-reactivity. If skin tests to any of these compounds were positive, the patient was considered to be allergic; if negative, a challenge test was performed. Sixteen patients (47%) were skin test positive to BPO and/or MDM, and nine (26%) exclusively to AX and/or AMP. In three cases (8%), the RAST was positive although the skin test was negative; one to BPO-HSA and two to AX-HSA and AMP-HSA. Six patients (17%) needed to be challenged with the penicillin involved to establish the diagnosis. In five patients (14%), the skin tests were positive to CE and in none to CEF. In all the others, the skin tests were negative to both cephalosporins, and the patients tolerated the drugs when challenged. These results indicate the relevance of side-chain-specific minor determinants in betalactams allergy and provide support for the role of this chemical structure in the evaluation of cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins.

Notes: We present the results of allergen content evaluation in 80 dust samples from 31 homes of atopic patients from two climatic areas (humid and subhumid), collected in two seasons of the year (autumn and winter). Monoclonal antibody-based immunoassays were used to quantify Der p 1, Der f 1, Der 2, Lep d 1, and Pel d 1. The results were compared according to climate, season, and the type of sensitization (Pyroglyphidae mites, storage mites, or grass pollens). We underline the predominance of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (89% of samples) over D. farinae (16% of samples) in our environment. Der p 1 rates were higher in the humid area (Mann-Whitney P 〈0.001), especially in the autumn (Wilcoxon P 〈0.05). Lep d 1 was detected in 23 % of samples and Lep d 1 levels were higher in the homes of patients sensitized to storage mites (Mann-Whitney P 〈0.05), whereas this allergen was not detected in the homes of pollen-allergic patients. Pel d 1 was detected in nine of the 31 homes (16% of samples) although there was a cat in only one home.