Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK; Malden, USA : Blackwell Science Inc
    Wound repair and regeneration 13 (2005), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1524-475X
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Introduction:  The cellular phases (granulation, reepithelialization, and dermal remodelling) of the healing process involve many cell types. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts are the key cells in granulation tissue formation and wound contraction.Objective:  To compare the effects on cultured human fibroblasts of a new nonadhesive lipidocolloid wound dressing, Urgotul®, with five other wound dressings including impregnated gauzes and some other modern wound dressings.Method:  Cultures in monolayer were used to study the morphology and growth of fibroblasts. The Bell model of cultured dermis equivalents was used to investigate myofibroblast differentiation. These cultures were labelled α-SM actin and F-actin.Results:  Two of the tested dressings induced cytotoxic effects on the fibroblasts. They were found to inhibit cell growth (greater than 60%) and to disturb cell shape and cytoskeletal differentiation. Urgotul® and the remaining three dressings showed no effect on proliferation. However some of them modified fibroblast morphology and affected F-actin distribution.Conclusion:  Depending on their nature and components, wound dressings may respect or affect in vitro fibroblast behaviour (proliferation, morphology, and α-SM actin and F-actin distribution). The observed in vitro findings require further investigations.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...