Bibliothek

feed icon rss

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Materialart
Erscheinungszeitraum
  • 1
    ISSN: 1524-4741
    Quelle: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Thema: Medizin
    Notizen: Abstract: This study demonstrates how data can be, and have been inappropriately grouped. Analysts have suggested that many of the parameters of mammographic breast cancer screening (recall rates, recommendations for biopsy, the positive predictive value of a biopsy, and cancer detection rates) change abruptly at age 50. We evaluated these parameters in the Massachusetts General Hospital Screening program by specific ages to determine whether there was a change at this age. Of the total of 72,229 studies, 19,988 (29%) of the women were ages 40–49; 20,116 (29%) were ages 50–59; 19,268(25%) were ages 60–69; and 12,857 (17%) were ages 70–79.Among these, 4,509 (6%) women were recalled for additional evaluation; 832 (1%) biopsies were recommended; and 219 (0.3%) cancers were diagnosed with an overall positive predictive value for a mammographically initiated biopsy of 26%.There were no abrupt changes in any of the parameters at the age of 50. The recall rate declined slightly from approximately 7.3% at age 40 to 5.2% at age 79, while the rate of biopsies recommended was virtually constant with age varying from 1% to 2%. The positive predictive value and the yiield of cancers increased steadily with age rising from 15% at age 40 to 43% by the age of 79. The cancer detection rate for combined prevalence and incidence among the screened women rose from approximately 1.9 per 1,000 women at age 40 to 5.0 per 1,000 by age 79. The grouping of data can lead to misinterpretation of the results. Screening guidelines should not be predicated on the false assumption that these variables change abruptly at age 50.
    Materialart: Digitale Medien
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1524-4741
    Quelle: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Thema: Medizin
    Notizen: Histologic subtypes of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been correlated with disease prognosis. There are conflicting reports on whether the grade of DCIS can be predicted by the morphology of calcifications seen on mammography. We undertook this study to determine whether the grade of DCIS can be reliably and accurately determined by mammography prior to excisional biopsy. Ninety consecutive cases of DCIS from 1993 to 1996 were identified, of which 75 cases had mammograms available for review. Any lesion with invasion was excluded. The mammogram showed only a mass in 10 of 75 cases, a mass and calcifications in 3 of 75 cases, and calcifications alone in 62 of 75 cases. Three board-certified radiologists with special expertise in mammography reviewed and categorized the mammographic findings as well, intermediate or poorly differentiated DCIS without knowledge of the histologic diagnosis. Histologic grading was performed without knowledge of the mammographic finding. Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were computed for each of the radiologists. For microcalcifications, the ROC comparisons of the radiologists' opinions of tumor grade and random chance were not significantly different. In those cases with available magnification views, the grade assessment did not change significantly. If only a mass was present on mammography, well-differentiated DCIS was the predominant histologic subtype. A histologic grade of DCIS cannot accurately be determined prospectively based on the mammographic appearance of microcalcifications. However, if only a mass is present, this is more likely to represent well-differentiated DCIS.
    Materialart: Digitale Medien
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...