ISSN:
1572-8099
Keywords:
Halons
;
SF6
;
simulants
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Architecture, Civil Engineering, Surveying
Notes:
Abstract All new and retrofit installations of Halon 1301 total flooding fire protection systems in U.S. Navy shipboard machinery spaces require an acceptance discharge test. The primary reason for this testing is the verification of system design and performance (discharge time, initial concentration, maintenance of concentration, etc.). It is desirable to use a simulant instead of Halon 1301 in these tests in view of its contribution to stratospheric ozone depletion. Two candidate simulants, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and chlorodifluoromethane (R-22 or Halon 121), were evaluated on the basis of flow through the piping networks of both modular and banked systems. Two modular systems, with differing fill densities, and six banked systems, varying in complexity from a two-nozzle balanced system to a four-nozzle unbalanced system, were used in this evaluation. Sulfur hexafluoride was found to discharge at a similar rate to Halon 1301 while R-22 was found to discharge at a faster rate. The division of flow between branches in the piping networks were similar for both simulants and Halon 1301. Together with previous work on leakage from an enclosure and initial mixing, these tests have shown that sulfur hexafluoride is an excellent simulant for Halon 1301 in acceptance discharge tests of total flooding fire protection systems. These conclusions will need to be confirmed in full-scale tests. The material presented here is extracted from a longer report that is available from the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01040177
Permalink
