ZIB

Hits per page

hits 1 - 2 | 2 hits

Sorting

Electronic Resource

Anger, Blame, and Dimensions of Perceived Norm Violations: Culture, Gender, and Relationships (2004)

Ohbuchi, Ken-Ichi ; Tamura, Toru ; Quigley, Brian M. ; [et al.]

Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Journal of applied social psychology 34 (2004), S. 0

add to mindlist on the mindlist

Details

ISSN: 1559-1816

Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005

Topics: Psychology

Notes: From a social cognitive perspective on anger, we attempted to examine the structure of perceived norm violations and their relationships with anger. We asked 884 university students from 4 countries (United States, Germany, Japan, and Hong Kong) to rate their experiences of being harmed in terms of norm violations, angry feelings, blame, and relationship with the harm doers. We found 2 culturally common dimensions in perceived norm violations (informal interpersonal norms and formal societal norms), and these dimensions substantially increased both angry feelings and blame in almost all cultural groups. The violation of interpersonal norms generally evoked anger more frequently than that of societal norms, but there were interactions between culture and relationship closeness and between gender and relationship closeness.

Type of Medium: Electronic Resource

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02788.x

Permalink

Library	Location	Call Number	Volume/Issue/Year	Availability

Others were also interested in ...

Paper (German National Licenses)

Fulltext

Electronic Resource

To Our Benefit or at Your Expense? Justice Considerations in Intergroup Allocations of Positive and Negative Resources (1999)

Otten, Sabine ; Mummendey, Amélie

Springer

Social justice research 12 (1999), S. 19-38

add to mindlist on the mindlist

Details

ISSN: 1573-6725

Keywords: distributive justice ; minimal group paradigm ; normative appropriateness ; positive-negative asymmetry ; social discrimination ; social identity theory

Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000

Topics: Political Science , Sociology

Notes: Abstract Several studies consistently demonstrated a positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In line with classical minimal group experiments, laboratory groups favored their in-group when allocating positive resources or evaluating positive dimensions. However, they refrained from discriminating behavior as soon as negative resources had to be distributed between groups. We propose that this is due to valence-specific differences in the consideration and perception of social justice. Several studies tested whether social norms inhibiting in-group favoritism and out-group derogation are differently interpreted or weighed due to the valence of resources. Consequently, a survey of these studies is given and their implications for classical theories on intergroup behavior and future research on social discrimination are discussed.