ISSN:
1435-2451
Keywords:
Carcinoma colorectal
;
Polyps colorectal
;
Rectal digital examination, diagnostic efficacy of
;
Dickdarmcarcinom
;
Dickdarmpolyp
;
Vergleich: rectal digitale-endoskopische Untersuchung
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Description / Table of Contents:
Zusammenfassung In einer prospektiven Studie wurden 2000 Patienten von zwei Ärzten rectal-digital untersucht, und anschließend rektoskopiert. Es fanden sich 312 Tumore (127 Carcinome), 463 sonstige pathologische Befunde, 1225 Untersuchungen waren o.B. 75 von 312 Tumoren (24,0%) wurden von mindestens einem, 44 (14,1%) von beiden richtig getastet. Von den Tumoren, die auf den ersten 10 cm ab ano lagen, wurden nur 44% getastet, 56% der in dieser Region gelegenen und in zahlreichen Retrospektivstudien als palpabel bezeichnete Tumore konnten nicht getastet werden.
Notes:
Summary Of utmost importance is the fact that, of the tumors located in the first 10 cm ab ano, only 44% were palpable and 56% were not palpable. In a prospective study 2000 patients were examined by two medical doctors rectal-digitally and by rectoscopy. The findings included 312 tumors (127 carcinomas) and 463 other pathologic conditions. 1225 examinations were without pathologic findings. Seventy-five of 312 tumors (24.0%) were palpable for one of the examiners; 44 (14,1%) were palpated by both examiners. Therefore rectal digital examination is not apt to uncover midrectal tumors; rectoscopy should be performed.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01579466
Permalink
