Library

Notes: We have established a culture system for microexplants of rat cerebellar cortical tissue in which cells develop morphologically, express type-A receptors for the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and form GABAergic synaptic connections. Criteria of cell size and shape allow reliable identification of granule and Purkinje neurons, criteria confirmed by studies of the binding of antibodies to calbindin D28K and GABA. Both granule and Purkinje neurons express GABAA receptors, but granule neurons fall into two classes in terms of their sensitivity. Granule neurons which do not show spontaneous synaptic currents are relatively insensitive to GABA, while granule neurons with synaptic currents are much more sensitive. The responses of Purkinje neurons to applications of 1 μM GABA are relatively insensitive to Zn2+ ions (10 μM), and are potentiated by chlordiazepoxide (100 μM) and La3+ ions (100 μM). Responses of innervated granule neurons, on the other hand, are blocked more strongly by Zn2+ ions, are less affected by chlordiazepoxide and are equally potentiated by La3+ ions. Hence these cultures provide a source of identifiable, functionally innervated cells which express distinct types of GABAA receptors.

Notes: Summary and Conclusions Work over the past ten years has greatly increased our understanding of both the structure and function of the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. There is a strongly supported general picture of how the receptor functions: agonist binds rapidly to sites of low affinity and channel opening occurs at a rate comparable to the agonist dissociation rate. Channel closing is slow, so the channel has a high probability of being open if both agonist-binding sites are occupied by ACh. Results of expression studies have shown that each subunit can influence AChR activation and have given a structural basis for the major physiological change known for muscle AChR, the developmental change in AChR activation. These general statements notwithstanding, there are still major areas of uncertainty which limit our understanding. We have emphasized these areas of uncertainty in this review, to indicate what needs to be done. First, the quantitative estimates of rate constants are not as strongly supported as they should be. The major reasons are twofold—uncertainties about the interpretation of components in the kinetic data and difficulties of resolving brief events. As a result, any inferences about the functional consequences of structural alterations must remain tenuous. Second, the functional behavior of individual AChRs is not as well understood as it should be. The kinetic behavior of an individual receptor clearly can be complex (section II). In addition, there is evidence that superimposed on this complexity there may be stable and kinetically distinguishable populations of receptors (section III). Until the basis for the kinetically defined populations is clarified, kinetic parameters for receptors of defined structure cannot be unambiguously obtained. Finally, it is not surprising that the studies of AChR of altered structure have not given definitive results. Two reasons should be apparent from the preceding points: there is not a fully supported approach for kinetic analysis, and the “normal” population may not be clearly defined. An additional complication is also emerging, in that the available data support the idea that specific residues distributed over all subunits may influence AChR activation. This possibility renders the task of analysis that much more difficult. The muscle nicotinic AChR has served as a prototype for the family of transmitter-gated membrane channels, which includes the muscle and neuronal nicotinic receptors, the GABAA, the glycine and possibly the non-NMDA excitatory amino acid receptor (Stroud et al., 1990). It is interesting to note that the functional properties of the GABAA receptor, probably the best-studied of the other members of the family are rather similar. In particular, opentime and burst durations show multiple components interpreted as reflecting openings of singly and doubly liganded receptors (Mathers & Wang, 1988; Macdonald et al., 1989), the distribution of gaps indicates a relatively complex gating scheme (Twyman et al., 1990; Weiss & Magleby, 1989), and multiple kinetic modes are likely to exist (Newland et al., 1991). The situation with regards to the effects of GABAA receptor subunit stoichiometry is more complex than for muscle AChR (e.g., Luddens & Wisden, 1991), perhaps similar to that found for neuronal nicotinic AChR (Papke et al., 1989; Luetje et al., 1990; Luetje & Patrick, 1991). Overall, it appears that the unresolved questions about the muscle nicotinic AChR are not indications that this is an exceptionally complicated transmitter-gated channel. Rather, it appears to be a relatively straightforward member of the family, and the lessons we learn from studying it are likely to be directly applicable to other receptors.

Notes: Abstract The current contributions of individual ionic channels can be measured by electrically isolating a small patch of membrane. To do this, the tip of a small pipette is brought into close contact with an enzymatically cleaned membrane of a hypersensitive amphibian or mammalian muscle fiber. Current flowing through the pipette is measured. If the pipette contains cholinergic agonist at μ-molar concentrations, square pulse current waveforms can be observed which represent the activation of individual acetylcholine-receptor channels. The square pulses have amplitudes of 1 to 3 pA and durations of 10–100 ms. In order to obtain the necessary resolution, a delicate compromise had to be found between different experimental parameters. Pipettes with 1–3 μm internal diameter and a steep final taper had to be used, extensive enzyme treatment was necessary, and conditions had to be found in which channels open at a relatively low frequency.