Electronic Resource
Cambridge
:
Cambridge University Press
The @Cambridge law journal
44 (1985), S. 458-476
ISSN:
0008-1973
Source:
Cambridge Journals Digital Archives
Topics:
Law
Notes:
The prevalent view of English lawyers as stated by Megarry & Wade1 is that “it is most unlikely that a right would be accepted as an easement if it involved the servient tenant in the expenditure of money; for none of the recognised easements does so, except the obligation to fence in order to keep out cattle.” This view has been expressed as a rule of law in the recent case of Ranee v. Elvin.2 Whether as a rule or as a mere presumption, it is widely regarded as part of the very fabric of the law of easements: timeless and immutable.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300114941
Permalink
Library |
Location |
Call Number |
Volume/Issue/Year |
Availability |