Library

Notes: Background In allergic diseases, eosinophils in affected tissues release granule proteins with cytotoxic, immunoregulatory, and remodelling-promoting properties. From recent observations, it may be assumed that eosinophils degranulate already in circulating blood. If degranulation occurs in the circulation, this could contribute to widespread systemic effects and provide an important marker of disease.Objective To determine the degranulation status of circulating eosinophils in common allergic diseases.Methods Using a novel approach of whole blood fixation and leucocyte preparation, the granule morphology of blood eosinophils from healthy subjects, non-symptomatic patients, symptomatic patients with asthma, asthma and Churg–Strauss syndrome, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis was evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and eosinophil peroxidase (TEM) histochemistry. Plasma and serum levels of eosinophil cationic protein were measured by fluoroenzymeimmunoassay. Selected tissue biopsies were examined by TEM.Results Regardless of symptoms, circulating eosinophils from allergic patients showed the same granule morphology as cells from healthy subjects. The majority of eosinophil-specific granules had preserved intact electron-density (96%; range: 89–98%), while the remaining granules typically exhibited marginal coarsening or mild lucency of the matrix structure. Abnormalities of the crystalline granule core were rarely detected. Furthermore, granule matrix alterations were not associated with any re-localization of intracellular EPO or increase in plasma eosinophil cationic protein. By contrast, eosinophils in diseased tissues exhibited cytolysis (granule release through membrane rupture) and piecemeal degranulation (loss of granule matrix and core structures).Conclusion In symptomatic eosinophilic diseases, circulating blood eosinophils retain their granule contents until they have reached their target organ.

Notes: In subjects not developing allergy, inhalation of nonpathogenic protein antigens causes no harm and is associated with tolerance induction. Repeated exposure to aerosolized ovalbumin (OVA) likewise does not evoke airway inflammation and induces inhalation tolerance in experimental animals. The present study explored the role of the inhibitory T-cell receptor CTLA-4, in preventing inflammation and in establishing inhalation tolerance in response to a protein antigen. Naive BALB/c mice were injected intraperitoneally with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody or control immunoglobulin G (IgG) and exposed daily to aerosolized saline or OVA over 10 or 20 consecutive days. OVA-specific IgE levels and the inflammatory response in airway tissues were assessed 2 days after last exposure. The OVA-specific IgE response was also evaluated in mice subjected to a subsequent immunogenic OVA challenge 18 days after last aerosol exposure. Additional mice were made tolerant by 10 days of OVA aerosol exposure and were then subjected to an immunogenic OVA challenge combined with CTLA-4 blockade or control IgG treatment. Repeated inhalation of aerosolized OVA alone did not cause a pulmonary inflammatory response. In contrast, 10 days of OVA exposure combined with blockade of CTLA-4 led to development of eosinophilic lung infiltrates, BAL fluid eosinophilia, goblet cell hyperplasia and increased OVA-specific IgE. By 20 days of OVA exposure and blockade of CTLA-4, the inflammatory response remained. Mice exposed to aerosolized OVA for 10 days exhibited greatly reduced OVA-specific IgE responses to subsequent immunogenic OVA challenge. Blockade of CTLA-4 during the period of OVA aerosol exposure did not prevent this suppression of the OVA-specific IgE response. Neither did blockade of CTLA-4 during immunogenic OVA challenge alter the allergen-specific IgE response. Our results indicate that in vivo blockade of CTLA-4 modulates the initial immune response to a protein antigen allowing the development of allergen-induced airway inflammation in naive mice. However, this initial exaggerated immune response is followed by the induction of inhalation tolerance, demonstrating that CTLA-4 signalling is not decisive in this process. Our findings also show that once inhalation tolerance is established it may not be disrupted by blockade of CTLA-4.

Notes: Background:  The neuropeptide secretoneurin, with potential relevance to leukocyte trafficking, is present in nerves of the nasal mucosa in allergic rhinitis and may be released in response to allergen and histamine exposure. There is no information on the occurrence and mechanisms of release of secretoneurin in healthy human airways.Methods:  The presence of secretoneurin in nasal biopsies and its release in response to nasal capsaicin and histamine challenges were examined. Symptoms and lavage fluid levels of fucose were recorded as markers of effects in part produced by neural activity. Bronchial histamine challenges followed by sputum induction and analysis of secretoneurin were also carried out.Results:  Nerves displaying secretoneurin immunoreactivity abounded in the nasal mucosa. Nasal capsaicin challenge produced local pain (P 〈 0.05) and increased the levels of fucose (P 〈 0.05), but failed to affect the levels of secretoneurin. Nasal histamine challenge produced symptoms (P 〈 0.05) and increased the mucosal output of secretoneurin (P 〈 0.05) and fucose (P 〈 0.05). Bronchial histamine challenge increased the sputum levels of secretoneurin (P 〈 0.05).Conclusions:  We conclude that secretoneurin is present in healthy human airways and that histamine evokes its release in both nasal and bronchial mucosae. The present observations support the possibility that secretoneurin is involved in histamine-dependent responses of the human airway mucosa.