Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology 339 (1989), S. 557-563 
    ISSN: 1432-1912
    Keywords: Histamine receptor ; Nucleus dorsalis raphe ; Cardiovascular regulation ; p-Chlorophenylalanine ; Mepyramine ; Cimetidine
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary The effects of microinjection of histamine and its antagonists into mesencephalic nucleus dorsalis raphe, were investigated on mean arterial pressure and heart rate in cats to elucidate the nature and role of histaminergic receptors in cardiovascular regulation. Microinjection of histamine (5 and 10 μg) into nucleus dorsalis raphe elicited both inhibitory and excitatory cardiovascular responses respectively. On the other hand, microinjection of H2-receptor blocker, cimetidine (10 μg) resulted in hypertension and tachycardia while H1-receptor antagonist, mepyramine (10 μg) microinjection evoked hypotension and bradycardia. Furthermore, local pretreatment with cimetidine and mepyramine blocked the inhibitory and excitatory cardiovascular responses of graded doses of histamine microinjection. These H1 and H2 receptors are localized in nucleus dorsalis raphe since microinjection of histamine into adjoining neural structures did not evoke any cardiovascular change. Furthermore, both the inhibitory and excitatory cardiovascular responses to histamine microinjection could not be observed in animals with spinal cord transection and in animals pretreated with p-chlorophenylalanine while they could be observed in bilateral cervical vagotomized animals. Thus, it appears that these cardiovascular responses to microinjection of histamine into nucleus dorsalis raphe, are due to modulation of serotonergic bulbospinal influence on sympathetic preganglionic neurones in the spinal cord. Moreover, the excitatory cardiovascular responses of high dose of histamine (10 μg) seem to result from a local release of noradrenaline since they were blocked by prior microinjection of guanethidine and piperoxan into nucleus dorsalis raphe. A release of noradrenaline in turn, modulates the activity of the neurones of the nucleus by acting on α adrenoceptors and thereby alters the activity of sympathetic preganglionic neurones. These α adrenoceptors appear to be of α1 type (Saxena et al. 1985, 1987) since phenylephrine microinjection evoked excitatory cardiovascular responses could be blocked by piperoxan.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Psychopharmacology 76 (1982), S. 228-231 
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: Foot-shock aggression ; Histamine ; Hist-amine antagonists ; Haloperidol ; Atropine ; Amphetamine
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The role of central histaminergic system in foot shock induced aggression was studied in mice. Histamine administered by intracerebral (IC) injection (25–200 μg) produced a significant increase in fighting episodes in a dose dependent manner. It was observed that mepyramine (H1 blocker) given intraperitoneally (IP) significantly increased and metiamide (H2 blocker) given IC decreased significantly the fighting response. To determine the nature of receptors involved in histamine induced facilitation of aggressive behaviour, histamine was administered IC in mice pretreated with mepyramine or metiamide. Mepyramine pretreatment further increased the facilitatory effect of histamine while metiamide blocked the enhancement of aggressiveness by histamine. Combined pretreatment with metiamide and mepyramine decreased significantly the fighting counts which remained unaffected after histamine. Haloperidol did not block the enhancement of aggression by histamine or mepyramine. However, atropine pretreatment partially inhibited the histamine induced increase in the fighting counts. Results of pretreatment with metiamide and atropine were similar to those obtained with pretreatment of metiamide and mepyramine. Metiamide alone or in combination with atropine failed to affect the facilitatory effect of amphetamine on the foot-shockaggression. It is concluded that central histamine H2 receptors have a facilitatory role and H1 receptors an inhibitory role on aggressive behaviour in mice induced by foot-shock. Since histamine per se had a facilitatory effect on foot-shock induced aggression, the central H2 receptors seem to dominate over the H1 receptors.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...