Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Bilateral receptive fields  (1)
  • Cuneate nucleus  (1)
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 39 (1980), S. 327-340 
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Slow waves ; Unitary activity ; Cuneate nucleus
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Depth profiles of averaged evoked potentials (AEPs) and simultaneously generated unitary activity have been recorded from the cuneate nucleus of the rat in response to controlled tactile stimulation of the ipsilateral forepaw. Four separate components of the AEPs were isolated, N1, N2, P, and N3. N1corresponds to the classical N wave previously described by other workers; four fractions of N1 are described. The classical P wave which follows N1 reverses at 150–350 μm depth to become a negative wave of identical time course, the N2 wave, at deeper locations. N2 peaks deeper than N1 within the non-relay portion of the cuneate nucleus, or below in the subnuclear reticular førmation where it is the only significant evoked component. Its strong susceptibility to high Mg++ C.S.F. superperfusion suggests a polysynaptic origin. It is argued that the depth distribution and time course of N2 does not support its function relating to depolarisation of primary afferents (PAD) in the vicinity of synaptically driven cuneate cells. Alternative possibilities for its origin are discussed. An additional sustained component of the AEP, the N3 component, is described and evaluated. N3 is co-extensive with N1, has a long time course and simple exponential decay, and is the component most resistant to high Mg++ C.S.F. superperfusion. A similar component to N3 has been described by previous workers in the spinal cord, where it has been shown to arise from glia depolarised by K+ effluxing from discharging afferents and cells. A similar origin for N3 is suggested, and its possible involvement with PAD discussed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 70 (1988), S. 155-165 
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Sm1 cortex ; Receptive fields ; Rat ; Bilateral receptive fields ; Hindlimb
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Single cells in the primary somatosensory (Sm1) cortex were investigated for responses to bilateral hindpaw stimulation in Wistar rats anaesthetised by continuous intravenous administration of Althesin. Fifty-one percent of cells sampled (N = 134) responded to equivalent punctate mechanical stimuli delivered to both the contralateral and ipsilateral hindpaws under light anaesthesia. The distribution by cortical depth of cells with receptive fields (RFs) on both hindpaws was not significantly different from cells which had only contralateral RFs. No cell was found with a purely ipsilateral RF. For 86% of cells tested (N=44) the ipsilateral RF was partly or completely homologous with areas within the contralateral RF. The sizes of ipsilateral RFs were smaller on 66% of occasions when tested against their contralateral RFs. Modal latencies to ipsilateral mechanical stimulation were longer than to contralateral stimulation (34.1±9.1 ms (S.D) cf. 26.4±7.2 ms, N=44). Ipsilateral RFs were lost for 77% of cells tested following a 33% increase in anaesthetic infusion rate. Conditioning mechanical stimuli applied to the centre receptive field (CRF) on the ipsilateral hindpaw reduced or abolished a cell's responses to equivalent test stimuli applied to it's contralateral CRF with C-T intervals of 20–200 ms. Conditioning stimuli applied to the CRF contralateral to the cell reduced or abolished responses to test stimuli on the cell's ipsilateral CRF using C-T intervals of 0–900 ms. Responses in one cortex to stimulation of the ipsilateral hindpaw were unaffected by elimination of responses from the same hindpaw in the opposite contralateral Sm1 cortex, where responses had been suppressed by topical Lignocaine administration. Retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase from hindpaw Sm1 cortex labelled many cells in homolateral thalamus, but failed to label cells in the entire forebrain contralateral to the injection site. It is concluded that direct crossed thalamocortical and callosal Sm1-Sm1 pathways do not contribute to the production of hindpaw ipsilateral receptive fields.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...