Bibliothek

feed icon rss

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    Digitale Medien
    Digitale Medien
    Springer
    Der Anaesthesist 43 (1994), S. 786-790 
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Schlagwort(e): Schlüsselwörter: Trauma – Kardiopulmonale Reanimation – Notarztsysteme ; Key words: Trauma – Cardiopulmonary resuscitation – Emergency medical systems
    Quelle: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Thema: Medizin
    Beschreibung / Inhaltsverzeichnis: Abstract. Posttraumatic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is associated with a poor outcome. When evaluating the literature according to the Utstein method, there were only 2 survivors (0.18%) out of 1,135 CPR attempts after trauma (Table 1). Differences in the study populations and levels of prehospital trauma care led us to analyse the results of a physician-staffed prehospital trauma care system in Cologne. Methods. From January 1987 to December 1990, a total of 49,054 emergency calls were registered using a standardised protocol. Among 9,595 trauma-related calls, 636 patients were found to be pulseless on arrival of the emergency team, 412 of these were pronounced dead. CPR was initiated in the remaining 224 patients, who comprise the study population (defined as 100%). All patients who were admitted to a hospital were followed using a second protocol. Results. CPR in the field was successful in 68 (30.4%) patients, who were then admitted to a hospital; 42 of these died within the first 24 h. Four patients (1.8%) could be discharged from hospital alive and were still living 1 year later, 1 with a lasting neurological deficit (Fig. 1). In 156 (69.6%) cases resuscitative attempts were unsuccessful in the field. Conclusions. Even in a physician-staffed prehospital trauma care system, the chance of surviving a post-traumatic cardiac arrest is minimal. Survival has to be regarded as an individual fate; the overall results are discouraging. Even though this study analyses the largest population of posttraumatic CPR ever published, prognostic factors could not be identified due to the few survivors. Nevertheless, the result does not justify general omission of CPR after trauma as: (1) prognostic factors for survival have not been identified thus far; and (2) no significant additional costs arise from posttraumatic CPR.
    Notizen: Zusammenfassung. Für die präklinische kardiopulmonale Reanimation nach Trauma werden in der Literatur Überlebensraten zwischen 0% und 1,7% beschrieben. Die vorliegende Arbeit analysiert die Ergebnisse der Reanimation Schwerverletzter am Beispiel einer Millionenstadt mit einem organisierten Notarztdienst. Vom 01. 01. 1987 bis zum 31. 12. 1990 wurden vom Kölner Rettungsdienst 9595 Verletzte präklinisch behandelt. Von diesen waren 636 bei Ankunft des Notarztes pulslos, in 224 Fällen (definiert als 100%) wurde eine kardiopulmonale Reanimation begonnen. 68 (30,4%) Patienten konnten in ein Krankenhaus eingeliefert werden, vier (1,8%) wurden lebend entlassen. Ein Schwerverletzter mit Herz-Kreislaufstillstand hat eine nur minimale Überlebenschance. Auch bei maximaler präklinischer Therapie unter Einsatz eines Notarztes ist die Überlebensquote enttäuschend. Trotzdem darf nicht grundsätzlich auf eine Reanimation Schwerverletzter verzichtet werden, weil keine Prognosefaktoren zur Identifizierung potentiell Überlebender existieren und weil keine zusätzlichen signifikanten Kosten entstehen.
    Materialart: Digitale Medien
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Digitale Medien
    Digitale Medien
    Springer
    Langenbeck's archives of surgery 383 (1998), S. 228-234 
    ISSN: 1435-2451
    Schlagwort(e): Key words Outcome ; Polytrauma ; Outcome research ; Quality of life
    Quelle: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Thema: Medizin
    Notizen: Abstract Background and aims: Outcome refers to the different facets of consequences resulting from an event or intervention. These consequences may be relevant for an individual patient, but also for society. There is a growing recognition that clinical research needs to define and focus on the outcomes of medical care. Outcome research should help health care professionals to better evaluate the effectiveness of specific interventions or a therapeutic concept. This broader base of evidence should then benefit the patients. Methods: The literature was reviewed with respect to concepts of outcome research as well as results of outcome research after major trauma. Results: Measuring outcome might be relevant for research purposes as well as in daily surgical practice. In the past, clinical research in trauma care has tended to focus on survival. Mortality rates are not out, complication rates are not out, but their value is limited and restricted to given scenarios with high mortality rates. New outcomes have to be added: such a functional status, emotional health, social interaction, cognitive function, degree of disability and other indicators of health. Conclusion: Despite differences in injury pattern and severity of injury, there is strong evidence from the literature that the quality of life is significantly impaired after major trauma. This is true for functional outcome as well as for psycho-social outcome in up to 70% of patients.
    Materialart: Digitale Medien
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...