Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • in vitroassay  (1)
  • paclitaxel  (1)
  • 1
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: advanced recurrent ovarian cancer ; paclitaxel ; second-line treament
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: Owing to the wide spread perception of a possible benefit from paclitaxel in the second-line situation the Nordic Gynecologic Oncology Group (NGOG) conducted two prospective phase II studies of paclitaxel single agent treatment (175 mg/m2, three-hour i.v. infusion with standard pre-medication every third week) in patients with relapsing or progressing epithelial ovarian cancer following platinum. Patients and methods: Between 1992–1994 138 patients in total were enrolled of whom 136 received paclitaxel and were included in the toxicity and survival analysis, while 112 were evaluable for response. Results: The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 28% with 16 patients achieving a CR (14%). The estimated median (range) time to progression was 4.1 (0.7–60.7) months. The projected four-year overall survival was 7%, with a median (range) of 9.6 (0.3–60.7) months. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that platinum resistance, and WHO performance status at baseline, independently correlated with survival at all three time points (median survival time 9.6, 18, and 24 months). Patients with platinum sensitive tumors and WHO performance status 0 had a median survival of 25.6 months compared to 7.0 months for the rest of the patients (P ≤ 0.0001). No serious toxicity was registered. Conclusion: Paclitaxel could safely be administered in an outpatient setting using this schedule. Patients with platinum sensitive tumors and a good performance status were most likely to survive. However, these patients are also most likely to respond to re-treatment with a platinum compound. With reference to the reasonably good tumor control and limited toxicity observed in this study, we conclude that paclitaxel single agent therapy is a viable option in the salvage situation, which in some patients can give long-lasting responses. However, although responses can be induced in a significant number of patients, the survival figures remain poor.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: chemotherapy ; drug interaction ; in vitroassay
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: Chemotherapy using multi-drug regimens is consideredmore active than single-agent therapy. This may be due to synergisticinteractions or, simply, a higher probability of administering an activeagent. We investigated in vitrothe type of drug interactions in arecognized regimen in relationship to tumour type and drug sensitivity. Patients and methods: The possibility of synergistic and additiveinteractions between individual cytotoxic drugs was investigated for thecomponent drugs of the established FEC regimen, i.e., 5-fluorouracil,epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, in 243 patient tumour samples representingvarious drug sensitivity using the non-clonogenic fluorometric microculturecytotoxicity assay. Results: Using a cell survival of ≤50% as a limit fordrug activity and sample sensitivity, the overall response rates to the mostactive single drug (Dmax) and the combination were 56% and64%, respectively, with a distribution among diagnoses similar to thatin the clinic. For 86% of the samples there was concordance withrespect to judgement of activity using either Dmax or thecombination. For samples being sensitive to at least one single drug,95% were also sensitive to the combination whereas for samples withinsignificant Dmax effect, only 2% were sensitive to thecombination. In samples with modest Dmax effects, i.e., cellsurvival in the range 〉50%–≤80%, 45%responded to the combination. The effect of the combination was generally wellpredicted from the Dmax effect. Conclusions:The superior antitumour effect of drug combinationscompared with single drugs may be due to the higher chance of selecting anactive agent. However, for intermediately sensitive tumours, additionalinteraction effects of a combination may be of clinical significance.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...