Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: Key words Nisoldipine ; Hypertension; Ca antagonist ; pharmacokinetics ; pharmacodynamics ; PK/PD modelling
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective: Nisoldipine, a calcium antagonist of the dihydropyridine class, has been used in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris. A new controlled-release dosage form (nisoldipine coat-core, NCC) has been developed to allow once daily dosing. In addition to a formal food interaction study as requested by regulatory authorities for controlled-release dosage forms, a subsequent study was conducted to determine the clinical relevance of the changes in nisoldipine plasma concentration vs time profiles seen in the food effect study. Methods: After a placebo run-in phase of 6 days, 12 hypertensive patients started treatment with 20 mg NCC once daily (days 0–3, 5–6, 8–9). On days 4, 7 and 10 the NCC was substituted for 5, 10 and 20 mg nisoldipine solution, respectively, in order to obtain nisoldipine plasma concentration vs time profiles comparable to the ones resulting from the concomitant intake of food and NCC. Simultaneous measurements of blood pressure (BP) and nisoldipine concentration were performed on days 3, 4, 7 and 10. Results: The relationship between nisoldipine plasma concentrations and percentage reduction in BP [diastolic (DBP) and systolic (SBP), supine and standing] could be described by an Emax model. The mean maximum reduction (Emax) relative to baseline was about 36.4% and 37.7% (DBP, supine and standing) and 27.9% and 29.2% (SBP, supine and standing), respectively. The interindividual variability (% CV) in Emax was low, ranging from 17.6% to 28.8%. The mean nisoldipine plasma concentration corresponding to 50% of the maximum effect (EC50) ranged between 0.99 and 2.62 μg · l–1 with a pronounced interindividual variability (% CV) of 89.5–108.8%. Mean Cmax values after administration of the 30 and 40 mg NCC together with food were 4.5 and 7.5 μg · l–1, respectively. Based on the concentration-effect relationship established in the present study, the effect achieved with a concentration of 7.5 μg · l–1 will be about 77% of Emax for DBP and about 88% of Emax for SBP, respectively. Conclusion: At the time of maximum plasma concentration the additional decrease in BP relative to baseline due to the food effect will be about 7–15% for DBP and 3–9% for SBP. After administration of the 10␣mg solution with a mean Cmax of 8.7 μg · l–1, only headache and flush with mild severity have been reported as adverse events. These maximum concentrations are comparable to Cmax values seen after intake of 40 mg NCC with food. With regard to heart rate (HR) there were distinct differences between the two formulations: Following administration of 5, 10 and 20 mg nisoldipine solution, there were dose-dependent increases in HR by a maximum of 4, 12 and 16 beats · min−1, respectively, whereas the HR profile for the NCC was similar to that seen under placebo treatment.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of clinical pharmacology 34 (1988), S. 207-209 
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: nisoldipine ; renal dysfunction ; pharmacokinetics ; blood pressure control
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary The pharmacokinetics of nisoldipine have been studied after oral administration of one 10 mg tablet to 3 groups of patients: Group A (n=8) with a mean creatinine of 90 ml/min, Group B (n=8) with a mean creatinine clearance of 12 ml/min and Group C of 12 patients on maintenance haemodialysis. All of them were studied off-dialysis and 7 were also studied on a dialysis day. No significant differences were observed between Groups A, B and C (on an interdialysis day) in AUC (0–7h), tmax, Cmax and plasma protein binding. Unchanged nisoldipine could not be recovered from the urine in any patient. Haemodialysis did not significantly affect AUC, tmax and Cmax, and nisoldipine could not be detected in the dialysate. The results indicate that the dose of nisoldipine need not be changed in patients with renal dysfunction, and that a supplementary dose is not required after haemodialysis. Blood pressure in the uraemics fell more than in the patients with good renal function.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...